Question: Reuse of old ships
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
I think re using older ships for other purposes is a great use of materials. It is almost canon to since it explains why we saw 150 year old ships in the war.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
I think it's a great idea and highly practical. In space, anything capable of interstellar travel can be put to use. The idea that it can't do anything worthwhile because it's not new is silly. There's a lot of unglamorous jobs that need to be done to run an interstellar civilization. Look at Cassidy's freighter ship in DS9... the thing looked, at least visually, decades old at minimum. Certainly at SOME point it must have been relatively state of the art. And that ship was doing everything from ferrying cargo to meeting with Tholians to smuggling weapons to the Maquis.Teaos wrote:I think re using older ships for other purposes is a great use of materials. It is almost canon to since it explains why we saw 150 year old ships in the war.
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
That's true even if you're in a brand new, state of the art ship. Short of some hocus pocus and double-crossing, the Sovereign-class Enterprise-E was almost destroyed barely a year out of spacedock, from its own self-destruct.Teaos wrote:But if things do end up going wrong in space your kind of screwed.
- SuperSaiyaMan12
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
- Location: Auburn
- Contact:
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
Correct, but I doubt the forces put upon a ship that's sitting pretty stationary in a single system, often not moving unless needed, would be very significant.Teaos wrote:But if things do end up going wrong in space your kind of screwed.
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
It's constantly under pressure from the air inside. It has the vibrations of all the equipment working inside it. Sure it might not be moving around but it is constantly under pressure of some sort.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: Question: Reuse of old ships
While it has never been explicitly mentioned, there must be some sort of "subspace drag" because every kind of acceleration requires that a force is exerted upon the hull.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re:
You're forgetting things like radiation from the sun. While we're protected by the ozone layer a space craft would have no such protection and radiation, and I'm sure other factors I'm forgetting, would wear the hull down. Maybe not as fast as a similar craft on earth, but it would break down eventually.Bryan Moore wrote:Correct, but I doubt the forces put upon a ship that's sitting pretty stationary in a single system, often not moving unless needed, would be very significant.Teaos wrote:But if things do end up going wrong in space your kind of screwed.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Re:
I'd tend to think that the amount of time it would take for solar wind to erode a starship hull would be so mind-boggingly long as to be completely moot for any practical purposes.ChakatBlackstar wrote:You're forgetting things like radiation from the sun. While we're protected by the ozone layer a space craft would have no such protection and radiation, and I'm sure other factors I'm forgetting, would wear the hull down. Maybe not as fast as a similar craft on earth, but it would break down eventually.Bryan Moore wrote:Correct, but I doubt the forces put upon a ship that's sitting pretty stationary in a single system, often not moving unless needed, would be very significant.Teaos wrote:But if things do end up going wrong in space your kind of screwed.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer