Page 7 of 9
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:53 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Really? Ensign Kim had his own quarters.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:58 pm
by Aaron
Rochey wrote:Really? Ensign Kim had his own quarters.
Would you share a room with him? Besides for some bizarre reason he was part of the Command Staff, that probably got him his own. Or roomie died in the Cartakers attack.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:58 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Good points.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:02 pm
by Teaos
I wonder how much undercapacity Voyager was running at.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:09 pm
by Aaron
Memory Alpha claims they lost over a dozen in the intial incident. Of a possible crew of upto 200.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:13 pm
by Teaos
Only a dozen? i thought it was a lot more?
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:16 pm
by Aaron
Teaos wrote:Only a dozen? i thought it was a lot more?
That's a fair number dude, enough to seriously hamper operations. Not helped by the fact that (convienantly) they were senior/vital people.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:57 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Then the Intrepids may do things differently. But in Lower Decks, one of the reasons Lavelle wanted to get promoted to Lieutenant was so that he could have his own room.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:40 pm
by kostmayer
They'd have had to give Kim his own quarters. If they put him in with other Ensigns, he'd surely notice when they got promoted and then moved out about once a month.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:55 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Perhaps Kim had his own quarters since he was a bridge officer. Trek does seem to regard jobs on the bridge as some kind of holy of holies.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:20 pm
by Sionnach Glic
He was also head of Ops, IIRC. That'd probably get him a bit of an upgrade.
'Course, you'd think he'd get a promotion as well.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:42 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Hey now, just because a Lieutenant Commander department head guy was killed, leaving a vacancy in rank and position that Kim filled, are you saying that Kim should ahve got the rank to go along with the responsibilities and role he was filling?
Why that's crazy talk!
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:45 pm
by Bryan Moore
Cpl Kendall wrote:Teaos wrote:Only a dozen? i thought it was a lot more?
That's a fair number dude, enough to seriously hamper operations. Not helped by the fact that (convienantly) they were senior/vital people.
Seems long odds, then, that they'd lose their doctor, nurse, first officer, helmsman out of the 12 they lost. Shitty odds!
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:46 pm
by Aaron
GrahamKennedy wrote:Hey now, just because a Lieutenant Commander department head guy was killed, leaving a vacancy in rank and position that Kim filled, are you saying that Kim should ahve got the rank to go along with the responsibilities and role he was filling?
Why that's crazy talk!
It is, Kim had neither the time in or the experiance to be a Lt. Cmdr or head Ops. At best the most he should have got was a brevet promotion and if they made it back he could have been confirmed.
Re: Graham's Galaxy Class Diplomatic Capability
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:46 pm
by Aaron
Bryan Moore wrote:
Seems long odds, then, that they'd lose their doctor, nurse, first officer, helmsman out of the 12 they lost. Shitty odds!
Bermans law man, bermans law.