Page 9 of 10
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:31 am
by Mark
DITL Code 64 reads
"Smurfs may not serve aboard a Starship. However, they are deployable to Starbases and ground facilities, where mushroom houses will not interfere with daily operations."
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:32 am
by Mark
Away Team Protocol 5
Phaser holsters must always be worn on the right hip, regardless of the dominant hand of the user.
(TNG 1&2)
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:34 am
by Mark
Away Team Protocol 5 (updated)
Phaser holsters must always be worn on the left hip regardless of the dominent hand of the user
(TNG 3-7)
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:56 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Mark wrote:DITL Code 44 section B
"The use of co-ed showers by tri-gendered or quad-gendered species must be supervised by no less that two officers at all times."
tri and quad gendered species
And I thought I was wierd.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:03 am
by Mark
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Mark wrote:DITL Code 44 section B
"The use of co-ed showers by tri-gendered or quad-gendered species must be supervised by no less that two officers at all times."
tri and quad gendered species
And I thought I was wierd.
Hey, for some folks two genders just ain't enough
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:17 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Mark wrote:Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Mark wrote:DITL Code 44 section B
"The use of co-ed showers by tri-gendered or quad-gendered species must be supervised by no less that two officers at all times."
tri and quad gendered species
And I thought I was wierd.
Hey, for some folks two genders just ain't enough
Well, I don't know about tri- or quad-gendered, but I had a friend who was quad-sexual...seriously.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:18 am
by Mark
HAD to have four partners at once??? Nice
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:22 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Mark wrote:HAD to have four partners at once??? Nice
If only it was that simple...
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:24 am
by Mark
I would literally BEG you for an explination. Oh please.....I've GOTTA hear this one
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:27 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Well, you know how bi-sexuals have a sexual interests in men and women? Well, he has a sexual interest in men, woman, animals, and plants...I really wish this was one of those things I was making up.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:48 am
by Mark
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Well, you know how bi-sexuals have a sexual interests in men and women? Well, he has a sexual interest in men, woman, animals, and plants...I really wish this was one of those things I was making up.
He could quickly get rich (and likely arrested in some states) by producing his own video line. Of course I had a friend decided to use the hole of a tree once for his "relief". I ended up taking him to the hospital a few days later because all the splinters the dumbass got became infected
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:28 pm
by Sionnach Glic
What a moron.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:25 pm
by Reliant121
Starfleet security protocol omega 427:
All tribbles serving in starfleet are to remain seperate of any other, and are not to be allowed into machinery compartments. Allowing this will result in swift extraction of 25 hair strands which the offendant will then be forced to eat in an omelette.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:23 pm
by Aaron
Starfleet Design Protocol 1337: No passive sensor shall be included into a vessel design when an active one can be utilised.
Re: Invent a stupid law
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:36 pm
by Mark
Starfleet Design Protocal 1
The main bridge of any and all starships under development for Starfleet, must be located at the top of each ships primary hull.
:::no further explination given:::