While this is in part true he also had his fleet crushed to no good purpose. He could have very well acheived the same result by aggresively engaging the Federation forces when he met them. Beyond that in that respect the whole battle plan on both sides makes little sense. If he only wanted to stop them them then he could have pulled back a few times and made Sisko start all over again. And if the only Federation goal was to get to the wormhole then why would the Klingons go to the battle, rather than straight to DS9? I have never really been clear on who was trying to accomplish what here. The tactics of both sides have always puzzled me here.Captain Seafort wrote:On the contrary - despite the Klingon intervention, Dukat won the battle. Sisko's objective was to reach DS9, destroy teh array that was dismantling the minefield, and thereby prevent Dominion reinforcements coming through the wormhole. Dukat's objective was to prevent this from happening. Sisko failed and Dukat succeeded. The fact that the Prophets pulled a deus ex machina on the Dominion fleet in the wormhole does not change this.
That battle is fought almost like there is no other way around for Starfleet forces, which does not make much sense.
Again this is another ambiguity I never quite figured out. If the Federation objective was only to get to DS9 and destroy the anti-mine system regardless of loss then why fight the battle at all? Space is 3 dimensional and some of those Federation ships were faster than the ships the Dominion had on hand, at least based on this sites numbers. I don't get what stopped them from simply going around, or under or over the Dominion forces and continuing straight on to DS9. So I presume they wanted to fight the engagement.Captain Seafort wrote:That tactic runs the risk of enough ships getting clear of the main action to reach DS9 in time to take out the anti-mine system, which would result in a Dominion defeat. Battles are not solely about who destroys most ships, but about who achieves their objectives.
I agree that makes sense but I still don't see why the main battle was fought there anyway to begin with other than the commanders wished to bring on a major fleet engagement. If we simply accept that an engagement must be offered there seems no reason that he could not have aggressively manuvered against the Federation with half or more of his forces and still retained a large margin to respond to any other incursions.Captain Seafort wrote:Dukat's strategy was sound - draw the Feds in by feigning a break in his formation, while massing forces to crush them when they moved to take advantage of that break. It gave him the opportunity to inflict a tactical defeat while continuing to stand on the defensive, and not overcommit forces that may have been needed to cut off any Fed ships that attempted to avoid the main battle and make for DS9. It also worked - the Defiant was the only ship to break through, even with the Klingons' intervention, and she arrived too late to achieve Sisko's objective.
There is no reason not to make a real attempt to win the battle at hand as then you most assuredly acheive your goal of securing passage from the wormhole for the remainder of your fleet. If you are worried about an end run it would make the most sense to have left 25% or so of your force at DS9 itself and then used the rest to actively engage the enemy, rather than take the whole force with you and not really utilize it.