Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998

Games

Reviewer : lowlymarine
Ave Rating : 0.0000 for 1 reviews
Title : Star Trek: New Worlds Rating : 0
Platforms : Windows Year : 2000
Review : I hate to be a voice of decent, but I'm shocked to read these overwhelmingly positive reviews of this game. It is hands down one of the worst Real-time Strategy games of our time. To compare it to Command and Conquer is an insult to that franchise, almost as much as to call it a real-time strategy game is an insult to the genre in general. The controls are nigh-impossible, the graphics are bland (yes, even for the time), the storyline is underdeveloped, and the gameplay, the most important part of any game, is atrocious. Units are slow and construct even slower, and to make matters worse, the maps are huge and there's fast way to scout. Plus there's no skirmish/custom mode of any kind, and no one ever played this online, so once you're done with the (largely slow and dull) campaign, that's it! I can attest that it at least works on XP home, however. For what little that's worth. Gamespot's review said it pretty well: "Star Trek: New Worlds promises to let you 'witness colony life at the most fundamental level,' but if that's true, then colony life isn't very exciting."

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 3,449 Last updated : 8 Jan 2025