Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
Ablative Armour Antigrav Units Atmospheric filter Comms Devices Computers Exocomps Force Fields Genesis Device Holographic Technology Impulse Engines Medical Technology Navigational Deflectors Particle Fountain Replicators Soliton Wave Drive Sonic Shower Stellar Cartography Stellar Re‑Ignition Terraforming Tractor Beams Transporters Tricorders Universal Translator Viridium Tracking Warp Drive Warp Scales Androids Cloaking Device Cloning Co‑axial Warp Core Comets Cryostasis D'Arsay Archive Dimensional Shift Drones Guardian of Forever Hypergiant Star Iconian Gateway Mind Probe Neutron Stars Null Space Catapult Orbital Tether Parallel Dimensions Particles Planetary Classes Planetary Collision Preserver Cannon Probes Psionic Resonator Quantum Slipstream Spatial Anomalies Special Powers Subspace Amplifier Subspace Phenomena Sunshield Trajector Transwarp Underspace Corridor Vaal Verteron Array Virtual Reality Headset Vision Augmentation Wormholes Additional Sci‑Tech

Games

Reviewer : NunterZ
Ave Rating : 2.0000 for 1 reviews
Title : Star Trek: Armada II Rating : 2
Platforms : Windows Year : 2001
Review : Compared to Armada 1 I loved so much, A2 is a step back in almost every aspect. The intro movie is nowhere to A1. Ingame cinematics are lame. The story lacks elegance. The ships look less 3D even than in A1. The borg design is terrible. The 3D playing area didn't add much to the game either. On the plus side, I must mention warp speed and colonizing planets, those were fun. But while I replayed A1 countless times, A2 is forgettable at best. Thus the ranking: 2.

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 2,558 Last updated : 23 Jan 2025