Page 1 of 3

Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:06 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Review of the script, focusing on the things dropped from the movie..

http://www.tnmc.org/The-Blog/star-trek- ... issed.html

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:03 pm
by Vic
I would have liked to see the Klingon sub-plot, just to see what they did to the Klingons if nothing else.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:04 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Interesting.

Though, how would the Klingons have cloaking devices in the 2230's? :confused:

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:05 pm
by Vic
Re-set universe, could be any reason.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:06 pm
by Tsukiyumi
The Narada attacking the Kelvin was the reset. There's no reason the Klingon ships should have cloaks before that.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:22 pm
by Nickswitz
Um... didn't they have cloak in ENT?

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:49 pm
by Aaron
Nickswitz wrote:Um... didn't they have cloak in ENT?
The Romulan's did and so did the race that raped Trip.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:57 pm
by Nickswitz
Maybe they stole it between then and Kelvin...

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:00 pm
by Captain Seafort
Tsukiyumi wrote:The Narada attacking the Kelvin was the reset. There's no reason the Klingon ships should have cloaks before that.
There are far to many differences between the Prime universe and the Abramsverse for the Narada to be the PoD - the Kelvin's crew wearing the Starfleet delta, the style of the bridge, with the window rather than a viewscreen (which is consistent between the Kelvin and the neo-E), and above all the sheer size of the neo-E. That isn't a design change thanks to a new and powerful enemy - it's indicative of a far stronger more advanced engineering base than existed in the Prime universe.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:12 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Yeah, I guess you're right. I suppose Enterprise (the show) would be the defining change, then.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:15 pm
by Captain Seafort
Or even before that. This isn't a case of "something specific happened differently, therefore x,y and z" - it's a completely different universe, with no ties whatsoever to the one the rest of the series are set in.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:27 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Too bad the writers didn't say that instead of "an alternate universe created by Nero going back in time".

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:36 pm
by Captain Seafort
An alternate universe was created by Nero's introduction. It just didn't diverge from the one we're used to. Besides which, while I don't think we're been given an official canon policy for neo-Trek yet, I'd say that what we see on screen trumps all else.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:40 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Okay, conceded. It sure didn't seem like the "prime timeline", did it?

Then again, with all the time travel in 'Trek, they left the TOS pilot timeline behind a few series ago.

Re: Script review

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:21 pm
by Lazar
A bit of a tangent, but considering all the retconning and timeline discrepancies in ST, I think it would have been awesome if they had established that the World War III of the 2050s was the same thing as the Eugenics Wars, and that the Eastern Coalition was the bloc of Asian and Middle Eastern nations led by Khan. It could have really helped tie the franchise together.