Page 1 of 6

You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:30 am
by Monroe
ENT is the only series that's still canon 100% :D
Least they kept the best right?

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:03 am
by Captain Seafort
They're all still canon - just a different universe. I'm not even sure Enterprise is the same continuity as XI, given the differences between the Abramsverse and the Geneverse even before Nero showed up.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:23 am
by Tsukiyumi
Captain Seafort wrote:...differences between the Abramsverse and the Geneverse...
You mean "Bermanverse", right? Don't blame Gene for Enterprise. At least, not directly. :lol:

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:52 am
by thelordharry
Tsukiyumi wrote:
Captain Seafort wrote:...differences between the Abramsverse and the Geneverse...
You mean "Bermanverse", right? Don't blame Gene for Enterprise. At least, not directly. :lol:
"Based upon Star Trek, created by Gene Roddenberry"

Guilty as charged!!! :)

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 12:28 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
As one of the larger ENT fans on the site... nah. I won't be a TOS violation or anything like that.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 1:25 pm
by Sionnach Glic
All we know is that there was an admiral named Archer who had a pet beagle. Aside from that, we know nothing.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:03 pm
by Graham Kennedy
The mention of "Admiral Archer's prize beagle" indicates that at least SOME version of Ent is part of this timeline.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:05 pm
by Tyyr
To bad it was the beagle and not Archer who got beamed into lala land.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:07 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Tyyr wrote:To bad it was the beagle and not Archer who got beamed into lala land.
Wait, why do you want Archer in Los Angeles? :mrgreen:

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:14 pm
by Angharrad
:laughroll:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
Tyyr wrote:To bad it was the beagle and not Archer who got beamed into lala land.
Wait, why do you want Archer in Los Angeles? :mrgreen:
:laughroll:

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:20 pm
by Tyyr
Gang violence.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:22 pm
by Monroe
Rochey wrote:All we know is that there was an admiral named Archer who had a pet beagle. Aside from that, we know nothing.
OH i didn't even catch the Admiral's name :D
I really liked ENT. I wish they'd have a few made or TV movies come out or a miniseries about the Romulan war.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:25 pm
by Captain Seafort
Monroe wrote:OH i didn't even catch the Admiral's name :D
Yep - it was Archer. I like to think that bit was put in as an expression of sympathy for everyone who hated that bloody dog. :)
I really liked ENT.
My condolences. I wish you a speedy recovery from this illness.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:27 pm
by Tyyr
Captain Seafort wrote:Yep - it was Archer. I like to think that bit was put in as an expression of sympathy for everyone who hated that bloody dog. :)
The dog was more tolerable than Archer.

Re: You know what this means...

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:34 pm
by Captain Seafort
Tyyr wrote:The dog was more tolerable than Archer.
Archer, as irritating as he was, at least had a decent reason to be at the centre of several plots by virtue of being the ship's CO. The dog didn't.