Page 62 of 85
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:31 am
by Sionnach Glic
Blackstar, are you unaware that the suffix 'taur' is related to the adjective 'taurine' which in turn describes something resembling a bull? After all, isn't that why the bull on the Zodiac is reffered to as 'Taurus'?
Are you further unaware of the fact that the noun 'Centaur' does not come from the word 'taur', but from the Greek word kéntauros?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:33 am
by Teaos
Was that a smack down I see?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:35 am
by Sionnach Glic
Would you believe that it was? 8)
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:38 am
by JudgeKing
It is not your right to make us believe it was a smack down?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:42 am
by Teaos
You have rights? What about lefts?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:08 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Rochey wrote:Blackstar, are you unaware that the suffix 'taur' is related to the adjective 'taurine' which in turn describes something resembling a bull? After all, isn't that why the bull on the Zodiac is reffered to as 'Taurus'?
Are you further unaware of the fact that the noun 'Centaur' does not come from the word 'taur', but from the Greek word kéntauros?
Are you unaware that things have changed in the past few hundred years, and that slang doesn't always follow the original meaning?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:37 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Are you unaware that this is irrelevant, as the meaning of the word is still the same? Should it really be our concern if a group of people screwed up on their understanding of a suffix? And does it not also prove that Dusk need not know what a taur, as you incorrectly define it, is?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:16 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Are you unaware that this is irrelevant, as the meaning of the word is still the same? Should it really be our concern if a group of people screwed up on their understanding of a suffix? And does it not also prove that Dusk need not know what a taur, as you incorrectly define it, is?
Wasn't Dusk asking what a taur was, in the context I was using it?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 6:33 pm
by Duskofdead
Rochey wrote:Are you unaware that this is irrelevant, as the meaning of the word is still the same? Should it really be our concern if a group of people screwed up on their understanding of a suffix? And does it not also prove that Dusk need not know what a taur, as you incorrectly define it, is?
Did you know that I agree with your first question in some instances? And that, along the same line of thinking, Occidental and Oriental are quite offensive terms?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:31 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Blackstar wrote:Wasn't Dusk asking what a taur was, in the context I was using it?
Are you unaware that this is irrelevant, as the meaning of the word is still the same? Should it really be our concern if a group of people screwed up on their understanding of a suffix? And does it not also prove that Dusk need not know what a taur, as you incorrectly define it, is?
Wasn't Dusk asking what a taur was, in the context I was using it?
Did you not realise that I was pointing out your erroneous assumption that 'taur' meant 'four-legged'?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:58 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Rochey wrote:Blackstar wrote:Wasn't Dusk asking what a taur was, in the context I was using it?
Are you unaware that this is irrelevant, as the meaning of the word is still the same? Should it really be our concern if a group of people screwed up on their understanding of a suffix? And does it not also prove that Dusk need not know what a taur, as you incorrectly define it, is?
Wasn't Dusk asking what a taur was, in the context I was using it?
Did you not realise that I was pointing out your erroneous assumption that 'taur' meant 'four-legged'?
Why are you assuming that I assumed that taur meant 'four-legged'? Didn't you know that in the furry subculture taur refers specifically to fursonas with a centauroid appearance?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:26 pm
by Reliant121
Did it not occur that furry subculture is not exactly mainstream and known to everyone?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:36 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Reliant121 wrote:Did it not occur that furry subculture is not exactly mainstream and known to everyone?
But how else would one refer to a taur-form then as a taur?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:41 pm
by Captain Seafort
ChakatBlackstar wrote:But how else would one refer to a taur-form then as a taur?
As a "Centaur-like species" perhaps? Or some other similar description that doesn't require detailed knowledge of furry-specific slang?
Re: Can a big thread that consist only of questions?
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:49 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Captain Seafort wrote:ChakatBlackstar wrote:But how else would one refer to a taur-form then as a taur?
As a "Centaur-like species" perhaps? Or some other similar description that doesn't require detailed knowledge of furry-specific slang?
But isn't taur shorter, faster, and simpler? After all, isn't the first thing that comes to mind when someone says taur, Centaur?