Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
What do you mean 'no'? The nacelles are pink in the original shot. I noticed the more realistic lighting.mwhittington wrote:No, they deepened the shadows and gave it more shine. Probably to make it look more realistic now that the energy beam is a light source.
Agreed. I think the ship looks like an artist rendition of the ship one might also find on deviantart for example.SomosFuga wrote:i don't like how the ship looks.
They look the same shade of red both before and after to me.Tsukiyumi wrote:What do you mean 'no'? The nacelles are pink in the original shot. I noticed the more realistic lighting.
You think so? I don't know..maybe....but to me one looks clearly like a computer generated picture (not even a particularily good one, mind you, there are far better ones to find on the net from casual artists).McAvoy wrote:Its probably because we are so used to the way E-D looks in TNG. Flawed or not.
Agreed, although in this case I would have corrected the beam location as they did except not to the phaser strip, maybe to the deflector. What i really dont like is the ship itself.Atekimogus wrote:You think so? I don't know..maybe....but to me one looks clearly like a computer generated picture (not even a particularily good one, mind you, there are far better ones to find on the net from casual artists).McAvoy wrote:Its probably because we are so used to the way E-D looks in TNG. Flawed or not.
It's just to detailed and perfect to look real to me......idk, the only thing I would change is the enviroment (planets, stars etc.) and special effects, since I highly doubt they have enough of a budget to make the SHIP look more real than a 6 foot model.
According to something I read -- If I can track it down I will -- the script has Picard order "main phasers" fire the energy beam, so they corrected it, erm, correctly...SomosFuga wrote:Agreed, although in this case I would have corrected the beam location as they did except not to the phaser strip, maybe to the deflector. What i really dont like is the ship itself.Atekimogus wrote:You think so? I don't know..maybe....but to me one looks clearly like a computer generated picture (not even a particularily good one, mind you, there are far better ones to find on the net from casual artists).McAvoy wrote:Its probably because we are so used to the way E-D looks in TNG. Flawed or not.
It's just to detailed and perfect to look real to me......idk, the only thing I would change is the enviroment (planets, stars etc.) and special effects, since I highly doubt they have enough of a budget to make the SHIP look more real than a 6 foot model.
Correct.McAvoy wrote:Well from what I understand there are no new CGI shots of the E-D, so what you are seeing is the actual model.
really? ok thenSonic Glitch wrote: According to something I read -- If I can track it down I will -- the script has Picard order "main phasers" fire the energy beam, so they corrected it, erm, correctly...
I haven't looked at the script but it's on an analysis of the Encounter at Farpoint sampler on Ex Astris Scientia -- -and Bernd is usually pretty accurate.SomosFuga wrote:really? ok thenSonic Glitch wrote: According to something I read -- If I can track it down I will -- the script has Picard order "main phasers" fire the energy beam, so they corrected it, erm, correctly...
They used a CGI version of the ship in the scene with the energy beam.SomosFuga wrote:i don't like how the ship looks.