Page 7 of 8

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:23 pm
by Deepcrush
A boy did it last week but he was trying to get out of class, not really trying to hurt me.

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:35 pm
by Monroe
Interesting thread. I think I'm going to go with the third option. I don't think Deep is evil just ignorant and its fun to piss him off. Though I have never seen him admit he's wrong in the past. I'll give him credit in that B5 debate we had, I was trying to see if it was possible to overcome an impossibility. However he had his ass handed to him in the thread on rather or not rule through ultimate evil is viable. And he lost even more soundly and much quicker in rather or not Jaffa could become hosts. And in neither case did he ever admit he was wrong. He might admit he's wrong in those Trek arguments I tend to avoid.

We're all wrong occasionally and I've seen him be dead right before. I think we agreed on the 'if vader had lived' thread. Being wrong doesn't make someone evil. There's people who still think the Earth is flat and they're not evil so why would Deep landing in the same boat qualify him for being evil? But yet he's not good either as I've never heard of him doing anything positive in his life.

I'll have to go with Chaotic Neutral and the third option is as close as it is. I do wonder who picked evil.

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:21 am
by Deepcrush
As, so you came in here to cry about getting beat so often? I thought we had the insult thread for that... :lol:

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:20 am
by Monroe
Deepcrush wrote:As, so you came in here to cry about getting beat so often? I thought we had the insult thread for that... :lol:
See, yet to admit he's wrong :P Deep I think my posts show I'm far from upset. You should reread Blackstar's old comments. Now that is someone who got upset :P Or.. read your defensive attitude that comes across in the posts :P

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:24 pm
by stitch626
You should reread Blackstar's old comments.
Hmmm, I do need a good laugh nowadays...

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:30 pm
by Tyyr
Good lord Monroe, do you have Aspergers or something that you just cannot let this shit go?

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:33 pm
by Aaron
:laughroll:

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:45 pm
by stitch626
Tyyr wrote:Good lord Monroe, do you have Aspergers or something that you just cannot let this s**t go?
Not funny. I have it, and I let it go.

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:59 pm
by Mark
I swear, I am going to start a thread for the most popular and influencial member ever of the DITL. And the winner would HAVE to be Blackstar.

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:01 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Who?

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:02 pm
by Captain Seafort
Mark wrote:I swear, I am going to start a thread for the most popular and influencial member ever of the DITL. And the winner would HAVE to be Blackstar.
:whack:
Tsukiyumi wrote:Who?
:whack:

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:05 pm
by Mark
Can anyone think of somebody who has had a greater influence and molded this site? Hell, even his name is now accepted DITL verbage.

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:06 pm
by Tyyr
Such as "DSG2K is pulling a Blackstar."?

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:07 pm
by Captain Seafort
Mark wrote:Can anyone think of somebody who has had a greater influence and molded this site? Hell, even his name is now accepted DITL verbage.
*Cough*

Re: Deepcrush - a force for good?

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:11 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Captain Seafort wrote:
Mark wrote:I swear, I am going to start a thread for the most popular and influencial member ever of the DITL. And the winner would HAVE to be Blackstar.
:whack:
Tsukiyumi wrote:Who?
:whack:
Nope. Still not getting it. I have no idea who he's referring to.