Re: TOS Federation Battlefleet and size
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:42 pm
Well, we KNOW that one can multiply. At least by a factor of 4.
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
That's madness!Monroe wrote:Then we will put both Sparticles inside a particle accelerator. May the best subatomic molecule win.
Discovering strange new worlds, patrolling the Klingon and Romulan borders, watching out for other threats, or simply too small to handle the issue. Put 500 ships on the Klngion border, 500 on the Romulan border, another 100 for internal exploration and border patrolling, and the Enterprise can be the only ship available in its size. Figure the Klingon and Romulan borders have their own schedules of repairs/patrols/duties, so we don't have to mess with that.Mark wrote:Space is big, and that was at the height of Federation exploration. Not hard to believe that MOST of the fleet was to far out discovering strange new worlds and all that.
I don't think it stretches credibility at all. In WW1 it would be entirely reasonable for the commander of a QE to state that "there are only four other like her in the fleet", despite the RN having over thirty dreadnoughts.Mikey wrote:Like I said, it could be interpreted that way. I agree that it's more plausible to think that he meant Connie-classes specifically. I still maintain that it stretches credibility to think that there were 12 or 13 Connies, but a thousand ships of similar tonnage.
7.5x the stated number isn't the same as 100x, even colloquially.Captain Seafort wrote:I don't think it stretches credibility at all. In WW1 it would be entirely reasonable for the commander of a QE to state that "there are only four other like her in the fleet", despite the RN having over thirty dreadnoughts.Mikey wrote:Like I said, it could be interpreted that way. I agree that it's more plausible to think that he meant Connie-classes specifically. I still maintain that it stretches credibility to think that there were 12 or 13 Connies, but a thousand ships of similar tonnage.
Small nitpick, but there were closer ships in STV. Just none with captains that had Kirk's experience.Bryan Moore wrote:Based on the whole "You're the only ship close enough" lines in ST:TMP and STV, and the fact that they had to intercept Reliant/couldn't wait for another ship to do it, we can assume it's a pretty small fleet. Notice, even, on the maps in Star Trek VI for Operation Retrieve, it was only a handful of ships available. Plus, no more than a couple dozen on that large map in Star Trek IV.