And, IMO, if you're stupid enough to sleep around with multiple partners, you're too stupid to procreate. Thankfully, that degree of moral policing isn't common. Let's hope it never becomes common.ChakatBlackstar wrote:...Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive...
Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
pssst...19 year old.Cpl Kendall wrote:I don't have to know you nor do I care too. Frankly your 18 years old and the statistics are aginst you, the fact remains is that your are willing to put 30 seconds of your time ahead of everyone else.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
You clearly don't know the first thing about me. I don't like alcohol, and I have to be careful about touching the stuff period(personal reasons). And I don't sell my cars. I drive them to their grave. And seat belts and airbags improve safety, without inconviencing anyone. A breathalyzer is inconvenient in every sense.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Then what the hell do you propose? Waiting 'till the driver's killed someone before putting them in their car? Not putting them in anyone's car? Interviewing every driver to see whether they should have one, and trusting them to be 100% truthfull?I never said that. Stop putting words into my mouth. I'm saying I shouldn't have them installed. I have no problem with having them installed in cars owned by people who are stupid enough to drink. Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive.
Basicaly, your entire argument is "it inconveniences me, so it's a bad idea".
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
So, does anyone have a pic on what these things would look like?
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
No, my arguement is "It inconveniences smart people, so it's a bad idea."Rochey wrote:Then what the hell do you propose? Waiting 'till the driver's killed someone before putting them in their car? Not putting them in anyone's car? Interviewing every driver to see whether they should have one, and trusting them to be 100% truthfull?I never said that. Stop putting words into my mouth. I'm saying I shouldn't have them installed. I have no problem with having them installed in cars owned by people who are stupid enough to drink. Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive.
Basicaly, your entire argument is "it inconveniences me, so it's a bad idea".
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
It wouldn't inconvienience me.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Probably something like this:stitch626 wrote:So, does anyone have a pic on what these things would look like?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Breath testers can be very sensitive to temperature, for example, and will give false readings if not adjusted or recalibrated to account for ambient or surrounding air temperatures. The temperature of the subject is also very important. Failure of law enforcement officers to use the devices properly or of administrators to have the machines properly maintained and re-calibrated as required are particularly common sources of error. Most states have very strict guidelines regarding officer training and instrument maintenance and calibration, and do you really think they're going to be able to enforce that kind of stuff in the general public?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Way to almost entirely quote the same Wiki article I read on the things. I already brought up the point of unreliability earlier; I'd guess they'd be using a more advanced model if they intend to make it mandatory... Unless they're going to pay for my bus fare.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Breath testers can be very sensitive to temperature, for example, and will give false readings if not adjusted or recalibrated to account for ambient or surrounding air temperatures. The temperature of the subject is also very important. Failure of law enforcement officers to use the devices properly or of administrators to have the machines properly maintained and re-calibrated as required are particularly common sources of error. Most states have very strict guidelines regarding officer training and instrument maintenance and calibration, and do you really think they're going to be able to enforce that kind of stuff in the general public?
BTW, that's "Jekyll".
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Hey, I'm not the one who made itRochey wrote:1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
Oh, right.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Hey, I'm not the one who made itRochey wrote:1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity.
Dev! Learn to spell!
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few--AND the one!
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?
To quote a famous Starfleet captain, "The needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many"me,myself and I wrote:The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few--AND the one!