Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

In the real world

Is this a good idea?

Yes, we should do this.
8
67%
No, bad idea.
4
33%
Maybe.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 12
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

ChakatBlackstar wrote:...Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive...
And, IMO, if you're stupid enough to sleep around with multiple partners, you're too stupid to procreate. Thankfully, that degree of moral policing isn't common. Let's hope it never becomes common.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
ChakatBlackstar wrote:
You clearly don't know the first thing about me. I don't like alcohol, and I have to be careful about touching the stuff period(personal reasons). And I don't sell my cars. I drive them to their grave. And seat belts and airbags improve safety, without inconviencing anyone. A breathalyzer is inconvenient in every sense.
I don't have to know you nor do I care too. Frankly your 18 years old and the statistics are aginst you, the fact remains is that your are willing to put 30 seconds of your time ahead of everyone else.
pssst...19 year old.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I never said that. Stop putting words into my mouth. I'm saying I shouldn't have them installed. I have no problem with having them installed in cars owned by people who are stupid enough to drink. Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive.
Then what the hell do you propose? Waiting 'till the driver's killed someone before putting them in their car? Not putting them in anyone's car? Interviewing every driver to see whether they should have one, and trusting them to be 100% truthfull?

Basicaly, your entire argument is "it inconveniences me, so it's a bad idea".
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by stitch626 »

So, does anyone have a pic on what these things would look like?
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Rochey wrote:
I never said that. Stop putting words into my mouth. I'm saying I shouldn't have them installed. I have no problem with having them installed in cars owned by people who are stupid enough to drink. Although IMHO if you're stupid enough to drink, you're too stupid to drive.
Then what the hell do you propose? Waiting 'till the driver's killed someone before putting them in their car? Not putting them in anyone's car? Interviewing every driver to see whether they should have one, and trusting them to be 100% truthfull?

Basicaly, your entire argument is "it inconveniences me, so it's a bad idea".
No, my arguement is "It inconveniences smart people, so it's a bad idea."
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by stitch626 »

It wouldn't inconvienience me.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

stitch626 wrote:So, does anyone have a pic on what these things would look like?
Probably something like this:





Image
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Breath testers can be very sensitive to temperature, for example, and will give false readings if not adjusted or recalibrated to account for ambient or surrounding air temperatures. The temperature of the subject is also very important. Failure of law enforcement officers to use the devices properly or of administrators to have the machines properly maintained and re-calibrated as required are particularly common sources of error. Most states have very strict guidelines regarding officer training and instrument maintenance and calibration, and do you really think they're going to be able to enforce that kind of stuff in the general public?
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Image
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

ChakatBlackstar wrote:Breath testers can be very sensitive to temperature, for example, and will give false readings if not adjusted or recalibrated to account for ambient or surrounding air temperatures. The temperature of the subject is also very important. Failure of law enforcement officers to use the devices properly or of administrators to have the machines properly maintained and re-calibrated as required are particularly common sources of error. Most states have very strict guidelines regarding officer training and instrument maintenance and calibration, and do you really think they're going to be able to enforce that kind of stuff in the general public?
Way to almost entirely quote the same Wiki article I read on the things. I already brought up the point of unreliability earlier; I'd guess they'd be using a more advanced model if they intend to make it mandatory... Unless they're going to pay for my bus fare.

BTW, that's "Jekyll".
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity. :roll:
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Rochey wrote:1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity. :roll:
Hey, I'm not the one who made it
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Rochey wrote:1) It's spelled 'Jekyll'.
2) The point of reliability was adressed earlier.
3) Your personal convinienve < peoples' lives.
4) Another stunning display of maturity. :roll:
Hey, I'm not the one who made it
Oh, right.

Dev! Learn to spell! :P
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Sonic Glitch »

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few--AND the one!
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Mandatory built-in breathalyzers in cars?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

me,myself and I wrote:The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few--AND the one!
To quote a famous Starfleet captain, "The needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many"
Post Reply