Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:30 pm
instead of giving up whatever else the Romulans might have asked for - something perhaps a little dearer, like inhabited planets, etc.
Page 6 of 10
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:10 am
As much as I hate to say it I get the feeling the Federation will bend over backwards for peace. Thus they would sign anything to prevent war.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:45 am
:::the necromancer strikes again:::: 
After the TNG Tech Manual, it's not like we didn't KNOW that the E-D wasn't gonna get destroyed, right? After reading that chapter in the end of the book, about the "visions" they were having for the E-E already. But, it was a REALLY weak way, for a ship I came to love, to go down.
After the TNG Tech Manual, it's not like we didn't KNOW that the E-D wasn't gonna get destroyed, right? After reading that chapter in the end of the book, about the "visions" they were having for the E-E already. But, it was a REALLY weak way, for a ship I came to love, to go down.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:49 am
Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.
Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.
Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:00 am
Three Vorchas, in a pitched battle.stitch626 wrote:Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.
Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:01 am
Even better. And with two BoP's, and while deffending a poor frieghter.Mark wrote:Three Vorchas, in a pitched battle.stitch626 wrote:Hey Mark, just a suggestion. On threads like these, that have been dead for a while, it is udually better for you to just start a new one.
Back on topic, yes it was a terrable way for the Enterprise I grew up with to go down.
It should have been from... two Klingon Vorchas.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:06 am
Yeah....so crippled Riker and Worf are standing in airlocks with E-suits and rifles, holding 'em off 
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:37 am
The saucer landing on the planet was cool even if the way to happened wasnt.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:20 am
The crash sequence was brilliant, but shields or not, the Enterprise should have been able to take that Klingon ship. A full weapons burst should have done it.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:14 pm
It was pretty pathetic to be honest. the E-D should have blown that klingon ship to hell in seconds, shields or not.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:38 pm
Indeed. Purely ridiculous.
I mean, I hated that ship, but I'd like it to at least have gone down with a little dignity.
I mean, I hated that ship, but I'd like it to at least have gone down with a little dignity.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:33 pm
Shooting the f*ck outta that klingn lump of turd would be appropriate.
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:18 pm
Yet again writers ruin something so simple. 
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:20 pm
Yes, even in death the GCS is a disapointment.
Man, is there anything that ship did right?
Man, is there anything that ship did right?
Re: End of Enterprise-D
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:34 pm
Yep. The destruction of the Yamatowas well done, IMO.