Page 6 of 16
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:52 am
by Tsukiyumi
Mark wrote:Door number three won you your very own.............Travel Pod!!!!!!!
Hey, I'd take one. By modern standards, it would be awesome.
"Hey, man. Check out my new car!"
"Screw that. Take a look at
this..."
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:53 am
by Mark
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:57 am
by stitch626
Nice.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:00 am
by Mark
Imagine picking up your date in one.
Oh yes. I'd be using the cockpit window for MAXIMUM effect
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:33 am
by Teaos
Mark wrote:It's a matter of usefulness. Impulse only shuttles are SEVERELY limited in the roles that they can play and their overall usefulness. If I had a choice of 100 warp capable shuttles or 500 impulse shuttles, which one would make more sense to take?
But giving it a warp core makes it far harder to build.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:06 am
by Tsukiyumi
Teaos wrote:Mark wrote:It's a matter of usefulness. Impulse only shuttles are SEVERELY limited in the roles that they can play and their overall usefulness. If I had a choice of 100 warp capable shuttles or 500 impulse shuttles, which one would make more sense to take?
But giving it a warp core makes it far harder to build.
Well, that's why he said 500 impulse shuttles vs 100 warp shuttles. A 5 to 1 ratio seems to illustrate the difficulty of building warp-capable shuttles. I'd also go with a mix, as stitch said; say 50 warp shuttles and 250 impulse shuttles.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:47 pm
by Sionnach Glic
You're not factoring in the cost. While it may be 5 times quicker to build a non-warp shuttle, it may also be 5 times cheaper, and require a lot less resources. Add all that in and you can see why Starfleet builds a lot of them.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:16 pm
by Mikey
Field maintenance must be a hell of a lot easier for a non-warp shuttle, also.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:48 pm
by Captain Seafort
They also wouldn't need antimatter. An important consideration, given Starfleet's safety record.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:59 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Aye, safer all around.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:01 am
by Mark
But they would be restricted to use in systems or by planetary facilities. A rather narrow scope, IMO
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:23 am
by Captain Seafort
That's not a serious limitation for a shuttle. They're so slow at warp as to take months between systems anyway, and they don't have the accomodation necessary for extended flights. If warp-capable shuttles are necessary then build a few, but the vast majority only require impulse drive.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:56 am
by Tsukiyumi
I like runabouts better, anyways. They'd be much better suited for short or medium-range travel than shuttles.
Man, I'd love to have a runabout.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 5:07 pm
by Sionnach Glic
But they would be restricted to use in systems or by planetary facilities. A rather narrow scope, IMO
Even a warp-capable one isn't going to be going to other systems anytime soon.
Besides, the whole point of shuttles is to ferry personel and equipment from your ship to another ship/starbase/planet. In the vast majority of those cases you'll have the ship itself nearby. As such, warp drive is not required.
Re: Most useless ship I've ever seen
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:24 pm
by Mikey
Or to take Geordi or Worf to a conference or competition and take long enough in the process to allow for abduction/space-time phenomenon.