USS Stargazer
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: USS Stargazer
Incompetance?
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: USS Stargazer
Plot Induced Stupidity?
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: USS Stargazer
Actualy, that's not proof. Why not? Because there are plenty of other ways he could have destroyed the ship, yet he tried none of them. So, obviously, he never even considered using the self-destruct.You mean, other then the fact he didn't use it? If it was as easy to use as you seem to think it is then why didn't he use it?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: USS Stargazer
Answer my points or don't post at all.Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
You've got it backwards. Ships like the Stargazer are replaceable, lives are not.
That said, the two are not mutually exclusive. Picard could have evacuated and scuttled the ship. If the destruct is offline all the engineering crew has to do is toss an overloading phaser into the antimatter storage and then get beamed out by a shuttle or take an aft escape pod.
Stunning, absolutely stunning. SF is not a military...but they are!
This is Starfleet, not the military. And without soldiers how can a military operate?
BTW, you recruit more. The Federation spans at least 160 member worlds, that's a lot of potential recruits and we've seen that they have no recruitment problems.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: USS Stargazer
Why not? If the destruction of the ship was such a priority then Picard should've considered it. And since he was found innocent and all at his hearing over the loss of the Stargazer this suggests that either A)Starfleet doesn't consider the prevention of the 'gazer's destruction to be of high priority or B)the self-destruct was offline and Picard did the right thing(in Starfleet's opinion) by not wasting time in creating a more elaborate method of destruction.Rochey wrote:Actualy, that's not proof. Why not? Because there are plenty of other ways he could have destroyed the ship, yet he tried none of them. So, obviously, he never even considered using the self-destruct.You mean, other then the fact he didn't use it? If it was as easy to use as you seem to think it is then why didn't he use it?
OOU, have the writers ever done anything that makes perfect sense so that we didn't argue about it?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: USS Stargazer
Yes, he should have. He didn't. Hence why I consider him to have failed in his duties here.Why not? If the destruction of the ship was such a priority then Picard should've considered it.
Or they couldn't come down on him like a tonne of bricks for screwing up due to the fact he saved his crew, it would be bad for public relations. Hell, they promoted Janeway to admiral for the same reasons (well, probably).And since he was found innocent and all at his hearing over the loss of the Stargazer this suggests that either A)Starfleet doesn't consider the prevention of the 'gazer's destruction to be of high priority or B)the self-destruct was offline and Picard did the right thing(in Starfleet's opinion) by not wasting time in creating a more elaborate method of destruction.
And as for "more elaborate", you don't need to be a genius to think up several ways in which to blow the ship up. It could be done easily and quickly.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: USS Stargazer
Yeah like the shuttles phasers...Rochey wrote:
And as for "more elaborate", you don't need to be a genius to think up several ways in which to blow the ship up. It could be done easily and quickly.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: USS Stargazer
Or just setting a torp to go off in ten minutes. Or beaming an overloading phaser next to the warp core. Or disabling the containment fields. Or leaving one guy behind to shoot the warp core.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: USS Stargazer
Oorrr..."lets turn off the batteries for the AM Contianment (or atleast turn them way way down) so they fail 5min after we've left the ship"Cpl Kendall wrote:Yeah like the shuttles phasers...Rochey wrote:
And as for "more elaborate", you don't need to be a genius to think up several ways in which to blow the ship up. It could be done easily and quickly.
EDIT: What Rochey said
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: USS Stargazer
Picard was court-martialed for the loss of the Stargazer, zealously prosecuted by Phillipa Louvois. In the end, he was absolved of all charges. see: The Measure Of A ManOr they couldn't come down on him like a tonne of bricks for screwing up due to the fact he saved his crew, it would be bad for public relations.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: USS Stargazer
On what grounds was he absolved of all charges?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: USS Stargazer
What's really funny is that we see on several occasions in TNG that AM containment can fail very easily yet Stargazer drifted for weeks without power.me,myself and I wrote:
Oorrr..."lets turn off the batteries for the AM Contianment (or atleast turn them way way down) so they fail 5min after we've left the ship"
EDIT: What Rochey said
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: USS Stargazer
Don't you just love how Chakat ignores anything he can't answer?
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: USS Stargazer
SShhhhh.....Cpl Kendall wrote:What's really funny is that we see on several occasions in TNG that AM containment can fail very easily yet Stargazer drifted for weeks without power.me,myself and I wrote:
Oorrr..."lets turn off the batteries for the AM Contianment (or atleast turn them way way down) so they fail 5min after we've left the ship"
EDIT: What Rochey said
And remember, the Stargazer was from what is known as the Era of Competently Designed Ships...as opposed to the GCS.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: USS Stargazer
They didn't say to my knowledge. Maybe he didn't do anything wrong according to Starfleet regulationsRochey wrote:On what grounds was he absolved of all charges?