Page 6 of 19

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:06 pm
by Captain Picard's Hair
kostmayer wrote:I think he meant to say that he was impressed you were so resistive.
:roll: That's the joke... part of it, at least (and I'm not Tsuki)

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:06 pm
by Reliant121
Far rather be with sisko (As a captain! i know what you were thinking =.=)

Kirk was the most annoying b*stard i've ever seen on television.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:07 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Captain Picard's Hair wrote:(and I'm not Tsuki)
Lucky you. :P

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:14 pm
by Mikey
Reliant121 wrote:(As a captain! i know what you were thinking =.=)
Don't be so hasty - I've met Avery Brooks a couple of times, and he's a strapping, striking-looking man.

Yes, I am confident enough in my heterosexuality to say that without getting the heebie-jeebies.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:30 pm
by Captain Picard's Hair
Ka-ching! I can now serve as XO under a captain, as a newly minted Commander. :)

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:30 pm
by Nickswitz
Good for you Mikey

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:39 pm
by Reliant121
Mikey wrote:
Reliant121 wrote:(As a captain! i know what you were thinking =.=)
Don't be so hasty - I've met Avery Brooks a couple of times, and he's a strapping, striking-looking man.

Yes, I am confident enough in my heterosexuality to say that without getting the heebie-jeebies.
he's alot older than me.

and, without meaning to be racist at all, i'm not attracted to black men

although they are meant to have HUGE members.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:50 pm
by Mikey
I used to wrestle, and it's not always true. When it is, though, it really is.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 am
by Mark
A female friend once explained to be it is because unlike caucasion men, theirs, when limp, doesn't shrink. She said, when erect, it's back to an individual "gifting". (although, as she was trying to get my pants off at the time, it's concievable she may not have been telling me the truth) :?

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:36 am
by katefan
Teaos wrote:He's annoying and in your face, I prefer a more laid back captain, one that doesnt need to go down on every away mission to prove what a big man he is.
Kirk did not lead every landing party. The Galileo Seven is one example of this, as is Shore Leave, The Return of the Archons, and Catspaw. And his leading landing parties was not unique. If you watch eps like The Cage/Menagerie and The Omega Glory we see other starship captains heading away teams. Apparently it is SOP before Picard's time, that period of 'Trek history where only Real Men could command star ships.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:37 am
by Reliant121
Kirk is still amazingly annoying.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:57 am
by katefan
Reliant121 wrote:Far rather be with sisko (As a captain! i know what you were thinking =.=)

Kirk was the most annoying b*stard i've ever seen on television.
More annoying than that Hepburn reject Janeway? More annoying than Furrow McFurrowbrow, aka Archer? More annoying than I-can-do-anything Sisko (Diplomat, Engineer, strategist)? I think not. When Kirk got into ship-to-ship battles he did not technobabble his way out of it (see Balance of Terror, The Deadly Years, Elaan of Trois, The Doomsday Machine and Journey to Babel to see what I mean), and when it came to fist fights he usually won.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:08 am
by katefan
Reliant121 wrote:Kirk is still amazingly annoying.
You don't fool me. I can read between the lines. When you say

"Kirk is still amazingly annoying."

You really mean

Kirk is still amazingly annoying

Please don't hide your admiration for 'Trek's most awesome male, you aren't alone.

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:51 pm
by Nickswitz
I'm going to be the one for mockery
Janeway
She lived because doesn't know where to stop or when to say no
go ahead
MOCK AWAY

Re: Under which Captain would you rather serve?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:47 pm
by Reliant121
katefan wrote:
Reliant121 wrote:Far rather be with sisko (As a captain! i know what you were thinking =.=)

Kirk was the most annoying b*stard i've ever seen on television.
More annoying than that Hepburn reject Janeway? More annoying than Furrow McFurrowbrow, aka Archer? More annoying than I-can-do-anything Sisko (Diplomat, Engineer, strategist)? I think not. When Kirk got into ship-to-ship battles he did not technobabble his way out of it (see Balance of Terror, The Deadly Years, Elaan of Trois, The Doomsday Machine and Journey to Babel to see what I mean), and when it came to fist fights he usually won.
Frankly, i would prefer to work under Hypocrit Janeway than Kirk.