USS Vengeance !!!SPOILERS!!!
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6232
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: USS Vengeance
I think the obvious point from the trailer is that the bad guy is described as 'one of our best operatives'. That kinda suggests Section 31 to me.
email, ergo spam
Re: USS Vengeance
Well Section 31 is more open in this universe then.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6232
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: USS Vengeance
I think the point was that he is an 'operative', what he did was obviously not part of Star Fleet's plan. He's gone rogue, so everything we see in the film is off plan for section 31, if it is section 31.
email, ergo spam
Re: USS Vengeance
An operative yes. But I got a feeling its like a top trained Navy Seal or Special Forces/FBI/CIA etc agent going rogue.
But the problem is that he would be in an organization that requires a ship or operates ships. He has a huge ship though.
But the problem is that he would be in an organization that requires a ship or operates ships. He has a huge ship though.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6232
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: USS Vengeance
But it kinda begs the question of why nobody knows about the ship.
email, ergo spam
Re: USS Vengeance
We font know that they don't know about the ship. It only gives the impression that Kirk didn't know what he was getting into. Could have been as easy as Kirk following Anti Kirk because Anti Kirk was found to be traveling in a shuttle.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: USS Vengeance
I was meaning more "offically" Federation. Its made by Federation people with Federation tech, but they have seperated from the Federation proper.Captain Seafort wrote:It's certainly got all the features of a Federation design.Teaos wrote:Is it truly Federation? I was under the impression its a ship of a splinter group.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: USS Vengeance
maybe it is some new battleship the UFP created with the help of Spock's knolwedge. Something to start to prepare against the Borg and Dominion etc etc etc... a huge leap in tech... and then these guys stole it...
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Re: USS Vengeance
Could have been built in secret by The Federation I suppose - they did design and test a cloaking device, then cover up the whole incident despite a ship being lost.
"You ain't gonna get off down the trail a mile or two, and go missing your wife or something, like our last cook done, are you?"
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: USS Vengeance
The federation will likely now never sign the anti cloaking treaty.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: USS Vengeance
... and since Nero was not smart enough to go to Romulus and share his obviously greater technology... the Romulans are at a great disadvantage in the arms war...
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Re: USS Vengeance
Or it is possible its a run of the mill 23rd century battleship like TOS.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: USS Vengeance
That JUST happens to be like ten times bigger than nEnill?McAvoy wrote:Or it is possible its a run of the mill 23rd century battleship like TOS.
Also, while I love the idea of it being section 31, or to help counter future threats, I hate to burst your bubble, but I think that's a little optimistic, to say the least.
I mean, the whole point of this nTrek is to BREAK with continuity, to give fresh air to the franchise.
Sure Archer was mentioned, but do you honestly expect them to be consistent with anything else?
I mean, they can't even be consistent with things like travel times and ship sizes (which is an obvious flip off to fans like the Ex-Astris guy [Bernd?]), why would you expect more consistency?
Sure, it would be awesome, just don't get your hopes up.
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6232
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: USS Vengeance
First, I don't hope it's Section 31, I fear it's section 31.LaughingCheese wrote:That JUST happens to be like ten times bigger than nEnill?McAvoy wrote:Or it is possible its a run of the mill 23rd century battleship like TOS.
Also, while I love the idea of it being section 31, or to help counter future threats, I hate to burst your bubble, but I think that's a little optimistic, to say the least.
I mean, the whole point of this nTrek is to BREAK with continuity, to give fresh air to the franchise.
Sure Archer was mentioned, but do you honestly expect them to be consistent with anything else?
I mean, they can't even be consistent with things like travel times and ship sizes (which is an obvious flip off to fans like the Ex-Astris guy [Bernd?]), why would you expect more consistency?
Sure, it would be awesome, just don't get your hopes up.
Secondly, Abrams has already said he doesn't want to break stuff just for the sake of it. The Ent is still the Ent, just different, Kirk is still Kirk, Spock is still Spock etc.
Thirdly, to think that Abrams even thinks of Ex-Astris or us even is pretty silly. The ship is the size it is because they wanted it to be big and industrial, not to piss off fans.
email, ergo spam
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: USS Vengeance
Oh, forgive my ignorance, what was wrong with Section 31?First, I don't hope it's Section 31, I fear it's section 31.
Sure they're crosswise with Gene's views but I still think they're a cool idea. To each their own I guess.
Oh, well that's good.Secondly, Abrams has already said he doesn't want to break stuff just for the sake of it. The Ent is still the Ent, just different, Kirk is still Kirk, Spock is still Spock etc.
Well I don't think I said that he does, I just mean, again I could be wrong, but some Trekkers can be a bit rabbid about details that aren't necessarily connected to the story. I'm sure he knows about that segment..Thirdly, to think that Abrams even thinks of Ex-Astris or us even is pretty silly.
Last edited by LaughingCheese on Mon May 06, 2013 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.