www.ditl.org

Tyyr wrote:Yep.

And nipple piercings only catch a lot if you use rings. Barbell's catch a lot less.

True, though at least the rings are easy to clean while it heals.

Yeah.

Though I didn't have to deal with that. She had them when I married her.

Tyyr wrote:Yeah.

Though I didn't have to deal with that. She had them when I married her.

Good deal on your part. It was...annoying waiting for them to heal.

Yeah, ouch.

I move all tramp stamps be placed in the "Dubt Tattoo" category.

Seconded.

Anything that automatically classifies you as a Tramp to the other sex is pretty much stupid to get.

I find honesty refreshing, personally.

At least you have an idea upfront of what you're getting.

The problem is not that you know up front that you're dealing with a ho - it's that you're also dealing with someone who's a dumba** enough to advertise that fact.

Mikey wrote:The problem is not that you know up front that you're dealing with a ho - it's that you're also dealing with someone who's a dumba** enough to advertise that fact.

I know at least one girl that's totally upfront about it, and certainly advertises it. I oddly enough find her honesty more attractive than the disinformation I'm usually fed.

Mikey wrote:The problem is not that you know up front that you're dealing with a ho - it's that you're also dealing with someone who's a dumba** enough to advertise that fact.

Err...what if your wife has one that commemorates the marriage and you like to RP?

Cpl Kendall wrote:

Mikey wrote:The problem is not that you know up front that you're dealing with a ho - it's that you're also dealing with someone who's a dumba** enough to advertise that fact.

Err...what if your wife has one that commemorates the marriage and you like to RP?

I think the fact of it commemmorating the marriage sort of takes out the "ho" factor.

As to the fondness for RP - I'm down, but I really really really don't want to hear particulars.

It's more the stupidity of that placement for a tattoo, yet how many tens of thousands of women have it there? It's so unoriginal, and usually they end up looking pretty stupid.

Bryan Moore wrote:It's more the stupidity of that placement for a tattoo, yet how many tens of thousands of women have it there? It's so unoriginal, and usually they end up looking pretty stupid.

I agree. Everyone should know what it means, and if they get one there, they shouldn't try to misrepresent themselves.

Bryan Moore wrote:It's more the stupidity of that placement for a tattoo, yet how many tens of thousands of women have it there? It's so unoriginal, and usually they end up looking pretty stupid.

See I don't see it as all that stupid of a spot. There's only so many places for tattoos, when was the last time a dude got slagged for having one on his arm? Seriously I've got one on my left forearm with huge cleavage!

I do however agree with you on the unoriginal, most tramp stamps are the tribal design and they all start to look the same. At least try and come up with something new. For example, my wife has an idea for one made of gladiolas, with the stems/vines running up the spine to the bra line. I think that's a little better then "oh look! A swirly thing with a heart" which (to me) is just a "finish here" target.