Page 5 of 7

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:24 pm
by Deepcrush
So it wasn't Tuesday! SCORE!

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:30 pm
by Toadnuke
Constellation and Oberth are the worst.

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:46 pm
by Captain Seafort
Hardly. The former is merely outdated, and the latter is a science ship, not a warship. They're unsuited for modern combat, but that doesn't make them bad designs in the same way as the Batch 1 GCS.

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:56 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Deepcrush wrote:So it wasn't Tuesday! SCORE!
Right. It was past Tuesday. Checkmate!

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:33 pm
by Deepcrush
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:So it wasn't Tuesday! SCORE!
Right. It was past Tuesday. Checkmate!
But was it past THAT Tuesday... OH!!! Burn your checkmate foo!

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:34 pm
by Deepcrush
Captain Seafort wrote:Hardly. The former is merely outdated, and the latter is a science ship, not a warship. They're unsuited for modern combat, but that doesn't make them bad designs in the same way as the Batch 1 GCS.
Agreed. You have to compare the design to its intended purpose. Not if it can match a ship from 100 years in the future.

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:36 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Deepcrush wrote:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:So it wasn't Tuesday! SCORE!
Right. It was past Tuesday. Checkmate!
But was it past THAT Tuesday... OH!!! Burn your checkmate foo!
So the Lakota should be properly outfitted! I sank your battleship!

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:38 pm
by Deepcrush
Lakota is a cruiser dude.

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:39 pm
by Captain Seafort
Or maybe it's a destroyer? :P

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:41 pm
by Deepcrush
Dude, do you really want to get spanked in two threads! :poke:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:25 pm
by Mark
I thought is was an antique...........


......Sorry, I just couldn't resist. :lol:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:24 am
by Deepcrush
Mark wrote:I thought is was an antique...........


......Sorry, I just couldn't resist. :lol:
Did you just call my beloved Excelsior class an antique????? :madashell:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:35 am
by Tsukiyumi
Aren't antiques over 25 years old? Just sayin'.

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:37 am
by Deepcrush
:uzi: :flamethrower:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:00 am
by Mark
:laughroll:

When 100 years old you reach, work as well, you will not.