Page 5 of 44

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:34 am
by Mark
A Nova class (a little better than the Oberth.....but still :bangwall: )

Image

Thanks much trekmania.net

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:35 am
by Mark
And an origianal design, the Intimidator Class

Image

From the folks at ussporthos.org

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:11 am
by bob
dosent look too original its basicly the sogvreign w/an extra nacelle, right?

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:28 am
by Nutso
Sovereign and Borodin class. None of them were done by me. I've had these for 4 years now and the website name and address escapes me.
Image

Borodin with weapon pod I think.
Image

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:50 am
by Mark
Nice.....I like that new ship.

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:17 am
by Captain Seafort
Mikey wrote:I'd always imagined that the deflector was necessary for warp travel; with some of the smaller ships, a hidden a/o small-scale deflector would be fine, but for larger ships (Connie, et. al.,) the large visible dish was more efficient.
It's worth noting that all the ships lacking the full deflector are single-hulled. It may be that the small-scale deflectors have a very limited area of effectiveness - not enough to cover the various pylons and necks of the larger designs.

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:18 am
by Teaos
Anyone else think the nacelle on that Nova kinda looks like a American flag?

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:13 pm
by JudgeKing
Ther Excalibur Class
USS Excalibur NX-90000
Image

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:19 pm
by stitch626
I don't remember where, but there is a canon okudagram of the Miranda showing the nav deflector to be internal, but close to the hull.

Also, for the type 9 shuttle, that isn't a nav deflector on the front, it is a phaser emiter (unless it is a deflector with a phaser emiter in it :? ).

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:45 pm
by Mikey
Captain Seafort wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'd always imagined that the deflector was necessary for warp travel; with some of the smaller ships, a hidden a/o small-scale deflector would be fine, but for larger ships (Connie, et. al.,) the large visible dish was more efficient.
It's worth noting that all the ships lacking the full deflector are single-hulled. It may be that the small-scale deflectors have a very limited area of effectiveness - not enough to cover the various pylons and necks of the larger designs.
That, and Rochey's comment, are pretty much what I was driving at - although I didn't notice the pattern that Seafort did.
stitch626 wrote:Also, for the type 9 shuttle, that isn't a nav deflector on the front, it is a phaser emiter (unless it is a deflector with a phaser emiter in it ).
Why not? The deflector dish on the Defiant was a nav deflector, probe launcher, torp launcher, and automatic drip coffee pot. :roll:

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:48 pm
by Graham Kennedy
stitch626 wrote:I don't remember where, but there is a canon okudagram of the Miranda showing the nav deflector to be internal, but close to the hull.

Also, for the type 9 shuttle, that isn't a nav deflector on the front, it is a phaser emiter (unless it is a deflector with a phaser emiter in it :? ).
No it isn't. The phaser emitters are to the sides.

Image

There's also reference to the nav deflector in one of the Voyager eps... the one with the forcefield full of primitives on the planet I think.

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:49 pm
by Nickswitz
Mikey wrote:Why not? The deflector dish on the Defiant was a nav deflector, probe launcher, torp launcher, and automatic drip coffee pot.
I gotta get me one of those :lol:

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:27 am
by Lt. Staplic
teos wrote:Anyone else think the nacelle on that Nova kinda looks like a American flag?
Kinda, but in the wrong colors,

what about the Integra class looks like a Nova with an extra pair of Nacells?

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:33 am
by Mark
Wish we had stats to go along with those pics.............alas :cry:

Re: Starship Pics

Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:42 am
by Lt. Staplic
we're :DITL:
if a ship has no facts we use deductive cannon facts and screen play to make accurate stats, we're aboca and beyond.
So who want's to take the time to prove or disprove that the Integra is a nova with 2 more nacells? :lol: