Page 5 of 8
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:32 am
by Graham Kennedy
IMO, the Mirror universe eps of Enterprise showed us what a modern TOS could and ideally should be like. Modern special effects by all means, but a modern implementation of the original designs.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:36 am
by Mark
I agree. In a mirror darkly was well done, with one exception. When Archer vaporized Admiral Black, why didn't they use the origianal disintegration effect?
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:37 am
by Mikey
That's what I mean - they kept the actual effect of the phaser the same, so I have no problem with a more modern SFX for it.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:43 am
by Mark
I see what you mean, but I would have felt better if they'd kept at least the "color" of the vaporizing the same. Don't get me wrong though, it was still cool.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:45 am
by Graham Kennedy
Mark wrote:I see what you mean, but I would have felt better if they'd kept at least the "color" of the vaporizing the same. Don't get me wrong though, it was still cool.
Yeah, I thought that. I wouldn't have minded the "creeping disintergration" effect, but why not make it blue like it was in TOS?
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:20 am
by Captain Seafort
They might have been a bit better off mixing the two - keeping the overall blue glow, but adding in the creeping disintegration underneath. A minor detail, but would have been a pretty cool combination of the old and the new.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:39 pm
by Teaos
I would keep the over all design the same but I wouldnt mind the adding tecturing to it. The original ship was smooth and grey, I wouldnt mind them adding panels and such to it. Would make it look more interesting while also keep true to the original.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:28 pm
by Sionnach Glic
I agree, make the ship look as though it really was put together from thousands of different pieces.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:05 pm
by Mikey
Which appears to be what they've done. Yes, the nacelles have those little bulbs - which could easily indicate a slightly more primitive design, but other details like the deflector dish have been kept.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:11 pm
by Reliant121
And the unprotected plasma feeds or large windows on the side of the Engineering hull. Perhaps, as time went by, they were deemed unnecessary.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:30 pm
by Mark
Where are you guys viewing these STXI Enterprise pics???
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:47 pm
by Reliant121
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:55 pm
by Captain Seafort
That isn't the STXI Enterprise - that's Gabe Koerner's "reimagined" E-nil.
TrekMovie article.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:57 pm
by Reliant121
They've been saying for a while thats the new E-nil. i'm confused now.
oh okay. feax pas there for me then.
Re: Kevin Smith sort of reviews STXI
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:00 pm
by Captain Seafort
Reliant121 wrote:They've been saying for a while thats the new E-nil. i'm confused now.
People have been saying the
Titanic was sunk by an iceberg for the past ninety-odd years. Doesn't make either of them correct, although they're both understandable.