Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:29 pm
I've only just found this thread...
Okay... The Dreadnought is, by my estimate, about 4800 m long.
Let's take a Nimitz class carrier as a base. Those are around 320 m long. The Dreadnought is 4800 m long, so 15 times the length. If the Dreadnought was Nimitz-shaped, it would be 3,375 times the volume. But in fact it's bigger than that by my eyeball - wider than the Nimitz is, probably taller too.
But let's be conservative and say it's only 1,000 times the volume. The Nimitz holds a crew of 6,000 or so - so by that reckoning the Dreadnought could hold 6,000,000.
And there's no water in arguments about "no room for anything else". The Nimitz has vast amounts of space devoted to fuel, weapons, engines, hangar, aircraft, maintanence facilities, and a dozen other things; and it's that we used as our scaling model. With a few million troops on board there would be PLENTY of room for other stuff.
It's a common thing for people to vastly underestimate just how much room there would be on a big ship. In sci fi we are so used to ships that are miles long but which are treated as if they are a couple of times bigger than present day ships. A mile long ship is HUGE. An aircraft carrier scaled up to one mile would be bigger than the entire current US fleet combined - it would be able to hold a crew of 750,000 people, and potentially up to 11,000 aircraft!
So yeah, the Dreadnought could easily carry that many.
Question two... is there a need? Well, depends. Yeah, we hear of things like 3,000 troops being enough to conquer Vulcan. But... well that's insane. Anybody who thinks that all you have to do to hold a conquered territory is take over a few government institutions hasn't been paying enough attention to the news for the last few years.
You may not need a lot to conquer, yeah, but to hold a foreign population of billions? Even if you were going to have one soldier per 10,000 locals that's a million or so... and that's a situation in where there will be thousands of small towns that almost never see an enemy soldier.
Frankly, holding a heavily populated enemy planet with a ratio of less than 100:1 is a fantasy. And for a planet like Earth or Vulcan, that's well into the tens of millions of troops.
Okay... The Dreadnought is, by my estimate, about 4800 m long.
Let's take a Nimitz class carrier as a base. Those are around 320 m long. The Dreadnought is 4800 m long, so 15 times the length. If the Dreadnought was Nimitz-shaped, it would be 3,375 times the volume. But in fact it's bigger than that by my eyeball - wider than the Nimitz is, probably taller too.
But let's be conservative and say it's only 1,000 times the volume. The Nimitz holds a crew of 6,000 or so - so by that reckoning the Dreadnought could hold 6,000,000.
And there's no water in arguments about "no room for anything else". The Nimitz has vast amounts of space devoted to fuel, weapons, engines, hangar, aircraft, maintanence facilities, and a dozen other things; and it's that we used as our scaling model. With a few million troops on board there would be PLENTY of room for other stuff.
It's a common thing for people to vastly underestimate just how much room there would be on a big ship. In sci fi we are so used to ships that are miles long but which are treated as if they are a couple of times bigger than present day ships. A mile long ship is HUGE. An aircraft carrier scaled up to one mile would be bigger than the entire current US fleet combined - it would be able to hold a crew of 750,000 people, and potentially up to 11,000 aircraft!
So yeah, the Dreadnought could easily carry that many.
Question two... is there a need? Well, depends. Yeah, we hear of things like 3,000 troops being enough to conquer Vulcan. But... well that's insane. Anybody who thinks that all you have to do to hold a conquered territory is take over a few government institutions hasn't been paying enough attention to the news for the last few years.
You may not need a lot to conquer, yeah, but to hold a foreign population of billions? Even if you were going to have one soldier per 10,000 locals that's a million or so... and that's a situation in where there will be thousands of small towns that almost never see an enemy soldier.
Frankly, holding a heavily populated enemy planet with a ratio of less than 100:1 is a fantasy. And for a planet like Earth or Vulcan, that's well into the tens of millions of troops.