Sovereign class
- Granitehewer
- Captain
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Teesside, England
- Contact:
An inference is more legit, if it seems to follow any evidence or seems to correlate with established cannon in related fields, so for example if starfleet operatives design starfleet warpcores and the united federation of planets is distinctly wholesome and apparently a moral torchbearer, we could thus assume a premise on this inferences; that starfleet might develop its own weapons and doesn't pilfer weapon technology from hostile powers, at least not overtly or en masse.
I don't know anything about warp cores, but was merely illustrating inferences.
I don't know anything about warp cores, but was merely illustrating inferences.
PTLLS (Tees Achieve), DipHE App Bio (Northumbria), BSc Psychology (Teesside), Comparative Planetology (LJMU), High Energy Astrophysics (LJMU), Mobile Robotics/Physics (Swinburne), Genetics (SAC), Quant Meths (SAC)
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
- Granitehewer
- Captain
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Teesside, England
- Contact:
yeaps!!
and i wasn't saying otherwise, all i was saying is that an inference is more likely to be true, if we have some supporting evidence and/or the inference correlates with established cannon regarding a related field.
and i wasn't saying otherwise, all i was saying is that an inference is more likely to be true, if we have some supporting evidence and/or the inference correlates with established cannon regarding a related field.
PTLLS (Tees Achieve), DipHE App Bio (Northumbria), BSc Psychology (Teesside), Comparative Planetology (LJMU), High Energy Astrophysics (LJMU), Mobile Robotics/Physics (Swinburne), Genetics (SAC), Quant Meths (SAC)
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
That means they design some not all. They could very well use contacts like our military do. It creats competition which drives development.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
#1 - Blackstar, your comment on the lack of definition in the chain of command in a civilian enterprise reinforces my point - Starfleet personnel obviously don't have this confusion.
#2 - Yes, many private enterprises perfrom mil-spec R&D and production... at the bid, behest, or patronage of a military organization. I'm not talking about Beretta, or someone else creating sporting weapons. McDonnel Douglas doesn't design a warplane unless the armed services create a bid!
#2 - Yes, many private enterprises perfrom mil-spec R&D and production... at the bid, behest, or patronage of a military organization. I'm not talking about Beretta, or someone else creating sporting weapons. McDonnel Douglas doesn't design a warplane unless the armed services create a bid!
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Thats because it costs to much money to create with out need.
Earth has no money thus they can create all the useless crap they need.
Earth has no money thus they can create all the useless crap they need.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
So you're saying that someone invented the quantum torpedo, for example, beacuse they needed a hobby?
BTW, did a woman in Wellington really call the police because someone stole her marijuana plants?
BTW, did a woman in Wellington really call the police because someone stole her marijuana plants?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Maybe.So you're saying that someone invented the quantum torpedo, for example, beacuse they needed a hobby?
Thats happened more than once.BTW, did a woman in Wellington really call the police because someone stole her marijuana plants?
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
I just watched ST IV: Voyage home this weekend. When they get to SanFran Kirk mentiones "They still use money" and then goes to sell his glasses. Him and Spock then try to get on a bus and walk off saying "What is 'exact change'"? Cute stuff.Teaos wrote:Thats because it costs to much money to create with out need.
Earth has no money thus they can create all the useless crap they need.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Here's a new little angle, and I'm not saying that it provides proof for this argument one way or the other - just something to ponder:
In TOS: Bread and Circuses, the lost ship was mentioned as the SS Beagle, explicitly described as a survey ship. Then, by the taxonomy "SS" and by the fact that her captain, R.M. Merrick, was an academy drop-out and a member of the "merchant" service, it is patently clear that she was NOT a Starfleet vessel. Obviously "merchant" would take on a different definition without the context of a money-based economy, but it is still clear that the Beagle was some sort of civilian vessel.
With no Federation/human-based commercial enterprise, why would there be a survey ship outside of Starfleet? That's not rhetorical; I'd like to hear a good explanation.
P.S. I'm not even considering the ideat that she was a specifically biological research vessel based on the name Beagle.
In TOS: Bread and Circuses, the lost ship was mentioned as the SS Beagle, explicitly described as a survey ship. Then, by the taxonomy "SS" and by the fact that her captain, R.M. Merrick, was an academy drop-out and a member of the "merchant" service, it is patently clear that she was NOT a Starfleet vessel. Obviously "merchant" would take on a different definition without the context of a money-based economy, but it is still clear that the Beagle was some sort of civilian vessel.
With no Federation/human-based commercial enterprise, why would there be a survey ship outside of Starfleet? That's not rhetorical; I'd like to hear a good explanation.
P.S. I'm not even considering the ideat that she was a specifically biological research vessel based on the name Beagle.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
I expect a lot of the apparent contradictions regarding the organisation and economy of the Federation can be explained as TOS/TNG differences. During TOS Starfleet was a lot closer to modern militaries, with non-Starfleet entities doing most of the civilian work - like the Beagle. This was also the time of a capitalist economy, with people like Merrick, Cyrano Jones and Harry Mudd selling goods and services for a profit. By the time of TNG the new Marxist Federation had taken control of pretty much everything, with such organisations as the Federation merchant service, the Federation Science Council, etc, controlling trade and scientific endeavours.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Quite simple - Kirk wasn't confused by the existence of money per se, but by its form. It's likely that physical cash has been replaced completely by electronic transactions. With no experience of handling transactions except by a retinal scan/thumbprint/PIN, perhaps without even a bit of plastic, it's understandable that he'd be confused by people demanding he had over bits of metal or paper.Mikey wrote:An excellent explanantion. However, if the TOS era was in fact one of commerce and therefore some sort of money, why would Kirk have been so befuddled in STIV, as Jim pointed out?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.