Scimitar vs. Sovereign
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
And also, voila! It fits with the frequency basis which you said it didn't.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
1) Torpedoes and other explosives have been stated to have frequencies before. It's stupid, but there it is.Thats for phasers now explain to me why PT in Q who and Bobw didn't have any affect on the cubes. They are not frequency based weapons.
2) The PT was able to damage the Cube in Q Who? because it had not yet adapted to the weapon. You'll note that a single Cube tore apart an entire fleet of ships at Wolf 359. That'd be pretty hard to do if it wasn't immune to torps.
Since we know precisely nothing about how phase tech works, we can't say either way.And phasing through shields and armour would work just the same.
Voyager was obviously able to replicate the 2-th century tech itself. Unless you propose that future-Janeway's shuttle is actualy a TARDIS, and she brought it all back herself.Why do you assume that they were allredy able to recrate the technology. Remeber Voyeger couldn't replicate the doctors mobile emitter.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
And the frequency part goes with the shield.1) Torpedoes and other explosives have been stated to have frequencies before. It's stupid, but there it is.
They are not frequency based weapons and they were able to adapt. That was the point.2) The PT was able to damage the Cube in Q Who? because it had not yet adapted to the weapon. You'll note that a single Cube tore apart an entire fleet of ships at Wolf 359. That'd be pretty hard to do if it wasn't immune to torps.
Since we know precisely nothing about how phase tech works, we can't say either way.
Hm. Whats diffren at going of inside a cube or a Warbird. Nothing. Bum is bum.
Realy. The central piece of the ablative armor could have been removed from the shuttle. If I'm correct the shuttle didn't deploy ablative armor when it was attacked. And the shuttle also has enough room for the x number of warheads.Voyager was obviously able to replicate the 2-th century tech itself.
It would be enough to bring just a few critical parts back.Unless you propose that future-Janeway's shuttle is actualy a TARDIS, and she brought it all back herself.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Correct. How does this refute the point?mlsnoopy wrote:And the frequency part goes with the shield.
And the point is wrong. You pointed out yourself that torpedoes, due to their shields, are as vulnerable to frequency related trickery as phasersThey are not frequency based weapons and they were able to adapt. That was the point.
The point, you deceitful little shite, was in reponse to this:Hm. Whats diffren at going of inside a cube or a Warbird. Nothing. Bum is bum.
Do not move the goalposts.You wrote:And phasing through shields and armour would work just the same.
Voyager's future-shielding was not produced from something as small as the shuttle's generator - it was produced from a number of large hull-mounted generators that we saw being installed.Realy. The central piece of the ablative armor could have been removed from the shuttle. If I'm correct the shuttle didn't deploy ablative armor when it was attacked. And the shuttle also has enough room for the x number of warheads.
It was not, however, big enough to carry all the equipment we saw being installed.It would be enough to bring just a few critical parts back.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Here's an outside the box idea. Perhaps because the timeline in which they were created was erased, so was the tech. So when Voyager exited the hub and reached Earth, all of her futuristic tech had vanished. What do you think?Rochey wrote:Then why were they never deployed on the E-E, the most powerful and important ship in the entire fleet, a few years later?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
I believe that the armour things were still on the hull, but it has been a while since I saw the ep.
However, perhaps future Janeway withheld key information required to replicate the armour so that after the mission was done, there would be limited contamination to the timeline (in her eyes).
However, perhaps future Janeway withheld key information required to replicate the armour so that after the mission was done, there would be limited contamination to the timeline (in her eyes).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
I always thought the armor would be one of the easiest things to reproduce in the 24th century. Really all you need is a replicator net on the hull to generate the armor when needed. It could also create new armor to replace whatever was was vaporised.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
The armour (or at least the generators) were definately still there when Voyager got home:
As for the issue of replacing the armour, you'd still need to carry a lot of mass of the appropriate materials around, whereas normal shields would only require power to recharge them. It's uncertain whether the armour is sufficiently better to make up for that weakness.
As for the issue of replacing the armour, you'd still need to carry a lot of mass of the appropriate materials around, whereas normal shields would only require power to recharge them. It's uncertain whether the armour is sufficiently better to make up for that weakness.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Well, the armor DID take a pounding that would have turned the shields to swiss cheese.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Initially it did, but the Borg adapted quickly, after which it wasn't much more effective than usual. It was the torpedoes that really made the difference, not the shields.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Agreed. If you think about it though, the tech exists already, it's just a matter of miniturization of the "phase cloak" tech and installing it on an existing torp.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
And they did all that without a spacedock and a crew of 150? Wow, Torres must have been Supergirl in disguise.Captain Seafort wrote:The armour (or at least the generators) were definately still there when Voyager got home:
As for the issue of replacing the armour, you'd still need to carry a lot of mass of the appropriate materials around, whereas normal shields would only require power to recharge them. It's uncertain whether the armour is sufficiently better to make up for that weakness.
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
engineers in spacesuits.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Boy, do I hate that episode.
Of course, I guess it was an appropriate ending to VOY: they technobabbled their way home.
Of course, I guess it was an appropriate ending to VOY: they technobabbled their way home.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Scimitar vs. Sovereign
Boy this thread has moved on. Sorry for not being able to post for awhile.
Give a man a fish he eats for a day........beat that man to death........you have an extra fish.