Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
If true then it's not... and never was. They just lied about it.Mikey wrote:But it’s already supposed to be the prime reality...
You know, I love it. As M. Night Shyamalan would say, "What a twist!" I mean, at the very least I won't be mad about Sposk's sister anymore. Traveling to parallel universes in a little bit more mainstream in America thanks to Rick & Morty. And there was news in the past about theGraham Kennedy wrote:So, here's a thing I saw mentioned which I missed. Remember in ep 3, when Lorca is doing the whole "bounce around the galaxy" speech to Burnham? And as he speaks, she sees images of various places. Here's one place she bounces to.
I trust we all recognise that?
Now here's the speculation I have heard with regards to this. I will spoiler it. It's just about the biggest spoiler there could be for Discovery, if true, so be warned.
I don't know what to make of that. I will wait and see, I guess.
Nah. CBS is making us pay for Trek. I would halfheartedly apologize to the creative staff though. Alex Kurtzman has been ardently defending STD's presence in the canon, and I've been rolling my eyes, cussing at him.stitch626 wrote:If true, I would watch it and halfheartedly apologize to CBS under my breath.
"You'll have to be patient with us." If I hadn't read Grahama's post, I wouldn't have any beliefs to attach to that. But now, yeah, I think Graham is on the right track there.All the changes to the world of Star Trek on the new show, Discovery, will eventually be explained. One executive producer of Discovery — Alex Kurtzman — has gone on record about the existence of seemingly large inconsistencies in the new dark and gritty Trek.
Mild spoilers for the first four episodes of Star Trek: Discovery.
“We are canon,” Kurtzman said during New York Comic Con on October 8. “You’ll have to be patient with us.” He suggested that, eventually, Discovery will reconcile certain differences between the year 2255 of Lorca and Burnham and 2264 of Kirk and Spock. Apparently, quite a lot can happen in just 10 years.
Nutso wrote:Nah. CBS is making us pay for Trek.stitch626 wrote:If true, I would watch it and halfheartedly apologize to CBS under my breath.
I prefer my episodes on the the good old BBC where they don't have adverts and only cost a license fee that you're already paying anyway.DarkMoineau wrote:Nutso wrote:Nah. CBS is making us pay for Trek.stitch626 wrote:If true, I would watch it and halfheartedly apologize to CBS under my breath.
You prefer having your episode preceded, interupted and followed by boring advertisement ?
Well it's true you have the BBC which is really ad free and not partially like France Télévision.... But both are more expensive than Netflix so if i could choose ^^Graham Kennedy wrote:I prefer my episodes on the the good old BBC where they don't have adverts and only cost a license fee that you're already paying anyway.DarkMoineau wrote:
You prefer having your episode preceded, interupted and followed by boring advertisement ?
Doesn't the CBS streaming thing also have adverts. I seem to remember that being a bugbear with people.DarkMoineau wrote:Nutso wrote:Nah. CBS is making us pay for Trek.stitch626 wrote:If true, I would watch it and halfheartedly apologize to CBS under my breath.
You prefer having your episode preceded, interupted and followed by boring advertisement ?
I thought the stream had ads. I remember people complaining that the there were too many ads.DarkMoineau wrote:Nutso wrote:Nah. CBS is making us pay for Trek.stitch626 wrote:If true, I would watch it and halfheartedly apologize to CBS under my breath.
You prefer having your episode preceded, interupted and followed by boring advertisement ?
It's so much more pleasant to watch a story uninterupted even if you have to pay Netflix (or CBS for America) because after all money is needed.
And that's not like almost every people here bought Star Trek in VHS, DVD and Blu-Ray...
There's a cheaper version with ads, but you can pay more and get it with no ads.Griffin wrote:Doesn't the CBS streaming thing also have adverts. I seem to remember that being a bugbear with people.
Sonic Glitch wrote:So before I get excited and start posting about different episode/aspects of Star Trek (heaven forbid we discuss a new Star Trek series on a Star Trek forum), I want to do a quick roll call: Who is actually watching the show and who is writing it off as #notmystartrek? Frankly, as much as I'd like to discuss the show the sense I get is that I won't be able to do that without a lot of "it's not like star trek used to be so I don't like it." -- but maybe I'm over-emphasizing the negative.
