Page 31 of 49

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:41 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Hey, at least my spam was in helping point out that your post was spam.
Thus doing a public service. :P

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:42 pm
by Thorin
Rochey wrote:Hey, at least my spam was in helping point out that your post was spam.
Thus doing a public service. :P
Doing a wrong to point out a wrong does not make it a right.

:wink:

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:44 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Two wrongs may not make a right, but they make a left. And everyone knows that three lefts make a right. :wink:

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:47 pm
by Thorin
Rochey wrote:Two wrongs may not make a right, but they make a left. And everyone knows that three lefts make a right. :wink:
Three lefts only make a right at perpindicular paths. And you have not made six right-angled wrongs to make your three adjacent lefts.

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:50 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Er...well....
*runs*

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:26 am
by Teaos
This thread is this off topic.

l------------------------------------------------------------------------l
^

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:14 am
by JudgeKing
Mikey wrote:Wow, it's like having my posts come in stereo! :lol:

However, I did fail to include one key example which Rochey didn't forget: The Japanese surrendered to MacArthur aboard the USS Missouri, a (North Carolina-class, I believe, but Seafort could correct me) BATTLESHIP! I don't call it a battleship because of any value judgement - I call it that because that's how the ship class was officially described, and because that's what it was. Can anyone legitimately state that the "Mighty Mo" was NOT a warship because a diplomatic function was held aboard her?
The USS Missouri was an Iowa-class Battleship.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:32 am
by DarkOmen
Teaos wrote:This thread is this off topic.

l------------------------------------------------------------------------l
^

i tried to bring it back with the pics, but to no avail

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:28 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Alas, I fear that this thread is lost forever...
You can blame me and Sunny for that.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:14 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
"You were the chosen one! You were supposed to bring balence to the threads not destroy them!":sword:

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 pm
by Teaos
31 pages and no agreement... usually we come to some sort of understanding.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:27 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Teaos wrote:31 pages and no agreement... usually we come to some sort of understanding.
This is because of two main reasons. 1) we don't have enough data on the Sovereign class to come to an agreement 2) We can't get some people to realize that Starfleet isn't a military.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:47 pm
by Sionnach Glic
31 pages? :shock:
Whoah!
2) We can't get some people to realize that Starfleet isn't a military.
For the Nth time. They are a military. I've lost count of the amount of times we've gone over this. :roll:

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:53 pm
by Teaos
God this debate is just

Is

Is not

Is

Is not

Is times infinity

Is not times infintiy plus 1 :lol:

So to have the last word. They are not a military.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:11 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Dictionary.com wrote:noun
7. the military,
a. the military establishment of a nation; the armed forces.
b. military personnel, esp. commissioned officers, taken collectively: the bar, the press, and the military.
Starfleet would fall under the title of 'armed forces', ergo they are a military.

*steals the last word*