Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Thats the point of an ambush... if you can't take your enemy head on, you use a surprise attack. Striking the Battlestars with their fighters still in the hangers.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Indeed. However, while the Atlantia did get caught out, and was destroyed before she could launch, this was not the case with the other Battlestars. As I pointed out, Athena's running tally of returning Vipers indicated that fewer than half were Galactica's own. Ergo, the Cylons were not engaging defenceless ships, but ships that had been caught on the hop but were nevertheless still able to launch.Deepcrush wrote:Thats the point of an ambush... if you can't take your enemy head on, you use a surprise attack. Striking the Battlestars with their fighters still in the hangers.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
I wouldn't be surprised if they were operating a CAP. Which would also explain the low numbers of survivors.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
The President (at Baltar's urging) explicitly prohibited standing CAPs, on the grounds that it might lead to a firefight.Deepcrush wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if they were operating a CAP.
Face it - the only way a Battlestar can go head-to-head with a Basestar with a decent chance of winning is if it obtains a position of superiority before the two engage.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
The president of the colonies... declares no CAPs... source.Captain Seafort wrote:The President (at Baltar's urging) explicitly prohibited standing CAPs, on the grounds that it might lead to a firefight.
As in superior fighters and pilots and weapons. Already knew that, been pointing to that all along.Captain Seafort wrote:Face it - the only way a Battlestar can go head-to-head with a Basestar with a decent chance of winning is if it obtains a position of superiority before the two engage.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Saga of a Star World, aka the original BSG film. Don't forget that in the original, Battlestar commanders weren't just naval officers, but senior political figures as well - the President was also Flag Officer Commanding the armistice fleet, and commander of the Atlantia.Deepcrush wrote:The president of the colonies... declares no CAPs... source.
As in drawing the Basestar's fighters away or crippling their sensors beforehand.As in superior fighters and pilots and weapons. Already knew that, been pointing to that all along.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Thank you for repeating yet again what we knew already for no reason what-so-ever yet again.Captain Seafort wrote:As in drawing the Basestar's fighters away or crippling their sensors beforehand.
In fact I have forgotten which is why I asked for the source that I'm still waiting for.Captain Seafort wrote:Saga of a Star World, aka the original BSG film. Don't forget that in the original, Battlestar commanders weren't just naval officers, but senior political figures as well - the President was also Flag Officer Commanding the armistice fleet, and commander of the Atlantia.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
*Sigh*Deepcrush wrote:In fact I have forgotten which is why I asked for the source that I'm still waiting for.
Captain Seafort wrote:Saga of a Star World, aka the original BSG film. Don't forget that in the original, Battlestar commanders weren't just naval officers, but senior political figures as well - the President was also Flag Officer Commanding the armistice fleet, and commander of the Atlantia.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
A quote or a youtube clip... not your word on it.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
So you're trying to conduct a debate about a series you evidently know little about, to the extent of being ignorant of key plot points of the most well-known and widely distributed episode of that series.
Concession accepted fuckwit.
Concession accepted fuckwit.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
You're stating something and when asked for evidence of it you get pissy.
How about you abide to your own sig dipshit.
How about you abide to your own sig dipshit.
Last edited by Captain Seafort on Thu May 26, 2011 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: How about you abide by the rules regarding text colours.
Reason: How about you abide by the rules regarding text colours.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
#1 - You asked for his source, he provided it, and you then said it wasn't valid because you didn't believe him.
#2 - WTF does any of that have to do with his signature?
#2 - WTF does any of that have to do with his signature?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
His word isn't a source.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Granted; but even though you disagree with him, do you have reason to believe that he's lying about the source he cited? When I mentioned what the SW Sourcebook said about the CR90, nobody said that I was lying and should provide a scan of the page.Deepcrush wrote:His word isn't a source.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Colonial Battlestar
Moving on...
Regarding the exposure and vulnerability of the bays on Battlestars: I was poking around online, and found the following pic from TRS: "Razor." Check out the ship in the background, starboard of the Pegasus.
It certainly seems smaller than the Pegasus, and has fewer engines/thrusters; but the side bits are certainly more well-integrated into the structure than the bays on a Battlestar. However, they don't look like launching/recovery bays. Anyone have any info on this class, or recall seeing anything similar?
Regarding the exposure and vulnerability of the bays on Battlestars: I was poking around online, and found the following pic from TRS: "Razor." Check out the ship in the background, starboard of the Pegasus.
It certainly seems smaller than the Pegasus, and has fewer engines/thrusters; but the side bits are certainly more well-integrated into the structure than the bays on a Battlestar. However, they don't look like launching/recovery bays. Anyone have any info on this class, or recall seeing anything similar?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer