www.ditl.org

Mikey wrote:

thelordharry wrote:I think it was a bit more than just a casting couch thing though? Weren't they an item for a while?

EDIT: Married no less!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majel_Barrett

Um... yeah. That was kind of my point. I was being sarcastic.

And how about Striker AND MM&I beating Tsu to a "biblical" joke?

MM&I, it makes sense. But me making a dirty joke like that before Tsuki? Are pigs arirborne yet?

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
MM&I, it makes sense.

{As Capt. Kirk in ST:VI} I'm not sure how to take that.

me,myself and I wrote:

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
MM&I, it makes sense.

{As Capt. Kirk in ST:VI} I'm not sure how to take that.

A compliment, I assure you.

I thought the quote was "sincere admiration"

Mark wrote:I thought the quote was "sincere admiration"

It is, but I'll take what I can get.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

me,myself and I wrote:

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
MM&I, it makes sense.

{As Capt. Kirk in ST:VI} I'm not sure how to take that.

A compliment, I assure you.

Well , in that case Thank You muchly.

Didn't know I had to complete the phrase, Mark.

No problem, MM&I.

Sorry, I couldn't resist

Cpl Kendall wrote:

Mark wrote:Hey, GR was the man!

I dunno, I consider using your position as producer to get woman to sleep with you is pretty damn sleazy.

Especially when you do it after you're married.

So much for the whole "enlightened utopia" thing, eh?

Rochey wrote:So much for the whole "enlightened utopia" thing, eh?

Do as I say, not as I do.

Rochey wrote:So much for the whole "enlightened utopia" thing, eh?

The message was still good, even if the messenger was lacking.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Rochey wrote:So much for the whole "enlightened utopia" thing, eh?

The message was still good, even if the messenger was lacking.

So if Jesus had been a wild party animal who kicked people a lot, would as many people have followed his message?

I'm kidding; you do have a good point, though hypocricy always irks me.

Well, he (or at least, some of his chroniclers) defended his marital infidelity with the lame excuse that he was a visionary, and such constraints didn't apply in his vision of how things should be, yadda yadda yadda.

BS.

It's like I told my wife when she asked me at one point when I was working closely with a female colleague:
"If I had ever wanted to cheat on you, I wouldn't have asked you to marry me."

Mikey wrote:..."If I had ever wanted to cheat on you, I wouldn't have asked you to marry me."

Precisely. I have no issue with people in "open" relationships, as long as both parties are aware of that going into the relationship. If it isn't discussed, or stated, then the obvious conclusion is that the relationship is exclusive. Only an idiot would assume otherwise.

Okay, that last part is aimed at one of my friends. If she ever gets back on here to read it.

Da-da-DUM!

But, yeah. From everything we've seen and heard, I'd say it was probably carelessness rather than malicious intent, but... yeah.