Technicalities.Tsukiyumi wrote:Right before it went FOOM.Mikey wrote:Agreed about the Oberth. Funny thing is, in exchange for the poor design, she doesn't really seem to have scientific apabilities too much ahead of a ship that isn't a dedicated science ship.
But yes, Graham, I remember her first appearance, and that difference in design made it pretty cool when it debuted.
What starship would you least like to captain?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Miranda class in the late 24th Century. You're just asking to die.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
- Location: Somewhere in the universe
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Raven- Darwin Award waiting to happen.
Miranda- nothing more than an oversized TIE Fighter in the late 24th century.
Frankenstein Fleet Ship- Abominations, must be purified.
Oberth Class- was destroyed in its first appearence, oversized cannon fodder.
Miranda- nothing more than an oversized TIE Fighter in the late 24th century.
Frankenstein Fleet Ship- Abominations, must be purified.
Oberth Class- was destroyed in its first appearence, oversized cannon fodder.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
That was due to the stupidity of its crew, rather than an inherent design flawJudgeKing wrote:Raven- Darwin Award waiting to happen.
True, but its a science ship. It's not intended to fight battles.Oberth Class- was destroyed in its first appearence, oversized cannon fodder.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Oberth fitted its roll well. Its the type of ship people around here love because it does one thing rather than trying to swiss army knife a dozen jobs into one hull.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Exactly, what do people expect from it anyways? She was deep in Federation territory and was a science vessel, SF's equivilant of an ocean mapping vessel. How well would one of those withstand a Harpoon?Captain Seafort wrote:
True, but its a science ship. It's not intended to fight battles.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
You'd think so. But I'd still like to see one instance of an Oberth being shown to have greater scientific capabilities than a contemporary ship.Teaos wrote:Oberth fitted its roll well. Its the type of ship people around here love because it does one thing rather than trying to swiss army knife a dozen jobs into one hull.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
It doesnt need to be greater. It just needs to fill its roll as well for less resourses and be better suited.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
One would think that a dedicated science ship should be better at scientific missions than a non-science ship. But, oh well. I understand your point about being equivalent but cheaper; but how do you get "better suited" for a role if you're not actually better at it?Teaos wrote:It doesnt need to be greater. It just needs to fill its roll as well for less resourses and be better suited.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
It's not necessarily true that a science vessel would have more scientific capability than something like an explorer. The way I always thought of them was that their advantage lay in the fact that they were cheap to build, cheap to operate, more numerous, and so could undertake longer term work. Whereas a Galaxy would bring all the best sensors and science equipment to a new planet, chances are it could only stay a few days before the next assignment. An Oberth might be much more austere in its scientific capabilities but could stay in orbit for months mapping the surface, gathering samples, charting the climate and weather over the long term, recording seasonal variations, tracking animal migration patterns, all the kinds of things that don't take big fancy equipment but do take people being there for month after month.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
You can always add sensors to a big ship to let it do what a pure science ship can do but it wont have been built for that one purpose in mind thus will be inferor in certain ways.One would think that a dedicated science ship should be better at scientific missions than a non-science ship. But, oh well. I understand your point about being equivalent but cheaper; but how do you get "better suited" for a role if you're not actually better at it?
Designing a ship just for science can allow you to creat wide open labs that flow into each other. Easier computer access and power supply. Have quarters right next to labs so people can work when they need to. Things that you just cant get away with on a normal ship.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Ah. Just a semantic difference, then. Everything you just described, Teaos, would be what I consider "better" - not just the actual material capability.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13110
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Any of the shuttles up to the type-11 would be my choice.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What starship would you least like to captain?
Is that really a captaincy?Tsukiyumi wrote:Any of the shuttles up to the type-11 would be my choice.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer