Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
That's what she said.Reliant121 wrote:You have no idea how good it felt to push that button.Mikey wrote:Reliant - you've earned it.
Lt. Staplic wrote:That's what she said.Reliant121 wrote:You have no idea how good it felt to push that button.Mikey wrote:Reliant - you've earned it.
didin't see my name in their either.
Meh. Too easy. (Pun absolutely intended.)Reliant121 wrote:You have no idea how good it felt to push that button.Mikey wrote:Reliant - you've earned it.
Tsuki, mark OR mikey, if you touch that statement in ANY way i will cyber-break your virtual fingers >.<
Schrodinger's water!Lt. Staplic wrote:
the last time someone asked me that question I explained that in one alternate universe the glass was completly empy and in another it was completely full so all answers inbetween and including apply.
Reliant121 wrote:You have no idea how good it felt to push that button.Mikey wrote:Reliant - you've earned it.
Tsuki, mark OR mikey, if you touch that statement in ANY way i will cyber-break your virtual fingers >.<
What about me...?Mark wrote:Reliant121 wrote:You have no idea how good it felt to push that button.Mikey wrote:Reliant - you've earned it.
Tsuki, mark OR mikey, if you touch that statement in ANY way i will cyber-break your virtual fingers >.<
:::sits protectively on hands:::
Engineer - twice as big as it needs to beLt. Staplic wrote:but what if the glass just had half a cup of water in it, would it be half full or half empty?
I'd just call it a waste of potential.Coalition wrote:Engineer - twice as big as it needs to beLt. Staplic wrote:but what if the glass just had half a cup of water in it, would it be half full or half empty?
Computer programmer - storage with potential buffer flow issue