www.ditl.org

Reliant121 wrote:Damnet. i'm 5''7' and weigh in at about 47 kg, or 7 1/2 stone.

Yes i know i am underweight. I eat a fucktonne though!

Better double the amount of fucktonnes per day, then.

Never fear............your just burning an insane amount of calories just by growing. You'll bulk up in the next few years......and maybe even grow some love handles too!!!

Ahhh the horror of it

Tsukiyumi wrote:

Reliant121 wrote:Damnet. i'm 5''7' and weigh in at about 47 kg, or 7 1/2 stone.

Yes i know i am underweight. I eat a fucktonne though!

Better double the amount of fucktonnes per day, then.

Tsuki...do you happen to own a Ro-Ro?

I'm 5'7.5", and weigh in at a whopping 146 lbs. I was always athletically slim at about 160 lbs., but now I can't keep a pound on for love or money.

Mikey wrote:I'm 5'7.5", and weigh in at a whopping 146 lbs. I was always athletically slim at about 160 lbs., but now I can't keep a pound on for love or money.

:::holds up hand:::

Talk to the hand.

I REALLY think I need to drop around 20 lbs or so. I'd like to get back into size 32s, or at least 34s.

I'm 32's, but I have to buy 34's b/c of the aformentioned leg issue.

i have 30 waist 30 leg at the moment. but i need 28 waist really.

my leg's a 34 long, though I think we're on differnt scales

Reliant121 wrote:

Tsukiyumi wrote:

Reliant121 wrote:Damnet. i'm 5''7' and weigh in at about 47 kg, or 7 1/2 stone.

Yes i know i am underweight. I eat a fucktonne though!

Better double the amount of fucktonnes per day, then.

Tsuki...do you happen to own a Ro-Ro?

A Roll-on, Roll-off cargo ship? Uh, I mean "what's a Ro-Ro?"

Reliant121 wrote:i have 30 waist 30 leg at the moment. but i need 28 waist really.

I had a 28 waist up until I enlisted when I was 18. Nothing like Army food to bulk you up

am I the only one that has realized that we're talking about the size and distance of our butt's from the ground with a gay guy?


jk Reliant.

Lt. Staplic wrote:am I the only one that has realized that we're talking about the size and distance of our butt's from the ground with a gay guy?

No, does it matter?

Edit: I doubt that Reliant is going to travel across the Atlantic to stalk a guy twice his age with twice the facial hair.

Agreed. I think the only time you need to consider it is when you can compare them directly. And don't flatter yourself - you may not even be his type.

Mikey wrote:Agreed. I think the only time you need to consider it is when you can compare them directly. And don't flatter yourself - you may not even be his type.

What I've always found funny is that a lot of guys automatically assume that a gay guy wants them, regardless of how they appear or their personal qualities. I mean come on, not even the most hormone driven straight guy would want to boink every single woman he meets. So why does it apply to gays?

It applies only in homophobic assumptions.