Page 25 of 100

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:01 pm
by Mikey
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:I wonder if Daleks even like salt and pepper on their food...
:laughroll:

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:39 pm
by Angharrad
Mikey wrote:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:I wonder if Daleks even like salt and pepper on their food...
:laughroll:
What do Daleks eat by the way?

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:48 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Royal_Foxx wrote:
Mikey wrote:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:I wonder if Daleks even like salt and pepper on their food...
:laughroll:
What do Daleks eat by the way?
Humble pie every time they encounter a certain Time Lord... or stairs. :P

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:03 am
by Tsukiyumi
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:... or stairs. :P
So, they're like ED-209?

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:33 am
by Mark
I hate this computer I'm using. Its older than Reliant I think. Takes about a minute and a half to load a damned forum page.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:44 am
by Reliant121
Bloody hell, that is old :|

For computer anyway.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:39 am
by Nickswitz
Hey Mark, they have some dirt cheap ones running windows xp on tiger direct, as well as some running Windows 7.
Just letting you know.
They aren't the best of the best, but you can go to the forum, use word on them, etc. So it's a pretty good deal, and for documents, just use openoffice.org, not as many features as Microsoft office suite has, but it has a good number of them.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:34 pm
by thelordharry
Isn't this lovely? A sunset on Mars...
Image

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:59 pm
by Lighthawk
Nice.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:40 pm
by Reliant121
I'm slowly finding myself being sucked into the cyclist vs. Motorist war, often now finding myself shouting and cursing at many a motorist around. I'm quite glad a lot of the Gosport cycle path features traffic lights just for cycle paths, but the sections of road allow me to expose my...motorist anguish.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:52 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Thank God for cycle lanes is all I can say on the matter.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:56 pm
by Captain Seafort
Reliant121 wrote:I'm slowly finding myself being sucked into the cyclist vs. Motorist war, often now finding myself shouting and cursing at many a motorist around. I'm quite glad a lot of the Gosport cycle path features traffic lights just for cycle paths, but the sections of road allow me to expose my...motorist anguish.
Has Gosport got any of the stupid suicide boxes that seem to be springing up elsewhere? Y'know - the ones where they put the cycle path on the tarmac and then extend it across the whole width of the lane at traffic lights.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:59 pm
by Reliant121
Captain Seafort wrote:
Reliant121 wrote:I'm slowly finding myself being sucked into the cyclist vs. Motorist war, often now finding myself shouting and cursing at many a motorist around. I'm quite glad a lot of the Gosport cycle path features traffic lights just for cycle paths, but the sections of road allow me to expose my...motorist anguish.
Has Gosport got any of the stupid suicide boxes that seem to be springing up elsewhere? Y'know - the ones where they put the cycle path on the tarmac and then extend it across the whole width of the lane at traffic lights.
I think there's one at Vale lane. However, I admit some cyclists are morons. Car > Bike, and in that vein the bike should stay as close to the left side as possible, regardless whether the suicide box says they can sit there. I never stray from the Left side, unless pulling out on road. Even then, I often pull onto the path and use a crossing.

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:00 pm
by Deepcrush
Is it wrong of me to hit a student with a beanbag because they woke up another student before I had a chance to hit them with a beanbag for sleeping in class?

Re: A new random thread

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:04 pm
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:Is it wrong of me to hit a student with a beanbag because they woke up another student before I had a chance to hit them with a beanbag for sleeping in class?
Yes. It is not, however, wrong of you to hit them with a beanbag because they assaulted another student (which prodding them awake technically is) or because you needed practice to keep your eye in. :wink: