Cardasian Federation war

The Next Generation
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Jordanis wrote:That's true, but I think the Cardassian situation is the greatest Danegeld we've ever seen the UFP pay.
Among the greatest certainly, but the Treaty of Algeron comes pretty close, if not ever greater.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

I would have to say that the Treaty of Algeron is indeed worse.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Yeah, Algeron is worse. The Cardie treaty caused some political unrest and minor territorial issues; Algeron stifled Fed defensive capabilitie for decades (and on into centuries.)
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Indeed. Algeron was far worse than simply handing over a few planets.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

And yet the Klingons/Romulans never tried to take the advantage in a major way. (Before the Nerandra III incident, in the case of the Klingons)
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
User avatar
Jordanis
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Oregon

Post by Jordanis »

Do we have a date on the treaty of Algeron? It occurs to me that the tech field at the time might have heavily favored sensors over cloaks.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

Remember we had a way of firing on cloaked ships back then. Spock and McCoy worked it out with PTs. That plus auto targeting would have made cloaks less useful. Starfleet had a good lead on its ships over the other empires up until around the 2340's. If the treaty was from before then, starfleet may not have seen the treaty and that big of a give up. It may have been a their jokers card. Give the enemy a gift that makes them think they have the advantage but in truth its just wishful thinking. I wouldn't think of starfleet today to have such ideas involving IQ but, the starfleet of old seems to have been a real military. I wouldn't put it passed 23rd century SFHQ.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Jordanis
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Oregon

Post by Jordanis »

Deepcrush wrote:Remember we had a way of firing on cloaked ships back then. Spock and McCoy worked it out with PTs. That plus auto targeting would have made cloaks less useful. Starfleet had a good lead on its ships over the other empires up until around the 2340's. If the treaty was from before then, starfleet may not have seen the treaty and that big of a give up. It may have been a their jokers card. Give the enemy a gift that makes them think they have the advantage but in truth its just wishful thinking. I wouldn't think of starfleet today to have such ideas involving IQ but, the starfleet of old seems to have been a real military. I wouldn't put it passed 23rd century SFHQ.
Yes, that's precisely what I was thinking when I wondered about the date. If it was STVI-ish era, it might have been a false gift, a calculated gamble that Starfleet technology would continue to largely negate the utility of the cloak (and that the Klingons and Romulans would eventually develop such sensor technology, meaning the cloak would not have been useful to Starfleet), letting them get something for a 'free' concession.

It may have been that, after the battle over Khitomer, the general consensus was that the cloak was on its way out. A mistake, but one that seems quite reasonable to make given that simple field modifications allowed the quick and easy destruction of a ship with the most advanced cloak the Klingons had.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

Very true. The Feds may have been hoping to stay ahead of the Romulans and the Klingons were down sizing their fleets at the time to deal with praxis.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

The Tomed Incident, which apparently led to the Treaty of Algeron, was in 2311, from Data's mention of a 53 year gap in Fed-Romulan relations as of "The Neutral Zone". As for the issue of detecting cloaked ships, the E-A's wake homing torpedo indicates that it was only effective at close range, since the ship's own sensors were ineffective. It's therefore likely that the method would only be useful for locating a cloaked vessel if its presence were already know or suspected, and cloaked ships would therefore still be useful for scouting and raiding.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Jordanis
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Oregon

Post by Jordanis »

Captain Seafort wrote:The Tomed Incident, which apparently led to the Treaty of Algeron, was in 2311, from Data's mention of a 53 year gap in Fed-Romulan relations as of "The Neutral Zone". As for the issue of detecting cloaked ships, the E-A's wake homing torpedo indicates that it was only effective at close range, since the ship's own sensors were ineffective. It's therefore likely that the method would only be useful for locating a cloaked vessel if its presence were already know or suspected, and cloaked ships would therefore still be useful for scouting and raiding.
True, but that's a field modification. Building on the principle, what can a full team of engineers accomplish in time to launch, saaaay... the Enterprise-B? My speculation is building on the DITL speculation of the E-B as an anti-cloak variant. And 2311 is quite in line with the timeline of the E-B.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

DITL has a good point. Even if the E-B wasn't truely the ship for fighting cloaked ships the thought of an auto targeting system and homing PTs makes a good bit of sense. That and with the excelsiors in mass production, starfleet may have just felt that it didn't matter. Cloaks were never the style of starfleet to begin with.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

When did the Federation begin installing outposts along its borders to detect the passage of cloaked ships? The Klingons/Romulans would still have the element of surprise and the potential to get the first shots off before Starfleet is able to raise shields, if their ships can fire quickly enough after decloaking.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Unknown - there probably wasn't an effective network along the Fed-Klingon border as of 2285/86, or Kruge's BoP would have been detected. The Romulan Neutral Zone had been covered since before the formation of the Federation, but that line was incapable of detecting cloaked ships. Overall, there's no evidence that cloaked ships could be detected beyond extremely close range until the Tachyon grid was developed. There's certainly no evidence that the equipment used in the wake-homing torpedo could be used as a long-range detection system.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

In STVI, in the HQ meeting. They had talked about removing the starbases and ship assignments. They seemed to see it as a major deal so I would guess that they must have had a sizable force there at the border. But, I don't think they had sensors at that time to detect cloaked ships. The biggest advantage would be the auto targeting systems. A ship or starbase could open fire before the klingon or romulan ship could get its shields up. A BOP, D-6 or D-7 could move about without being seen but if they wanted to attack then they would have to decloak some distance out of phaser range to avoid being targeted to quickly.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply