Wonderful indeed.Vic wrote:Isn't speculation wonderful?
Possible Roles For Fighters
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
I think you have in mind the WWII fighter bombers with torps or the dive bombers, both had to get very very close to their objetives. At the present time, fighters with antiship missiles and torpedoes are a very real menace for any kind of ship at medium range.Mikey wrote:And without going back and quoting everyone, there seems to be an idea that fighters could be extremely effective as torpedo-bombers. The use of such craft was tricky at best during WWII; in 24th century 'Trek - as GK as made reference to - the abilities of starships to provide "flak"/point defense/generally render fighters to be little more than a nuisance makes that prospect even riskier. Is it worth sending a whole wing - a whole flight, even - of fighters and pilots to their flaming deaths in order to land one or two torp hits? IF those fighters can even carry regular-sized torps?
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Missiles are a threat because they can be launched from over the horizon and can easily get lost to radar among the sea clutter, and torpedoes are even more difficult to pick up, especially if they're fired from below a thermal layer. In space there's no such interference to worry about.SomosFuga wrote:I think you have in mind the WWII fighter bombers with torps or the dive bombers, both had to get very very close to their objetives. At the present time, fighters with antiship missiles and torpedoes are a very real menace for any kind of ship at medium range.
Moreover, we've only ever seen torpedo shields when they've been launched at high speed - underslung weapons may not be able to generate their own, which would probably have some effect on their effectiveness.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Don't photons generally draw antimatter from the launching vessel, or was that not canon?
Even squadrons of torpedo-armed Runabouts could be useful in a fleet battle, IMO. Although, I guess since we never saw them used that way, there must be some reason not to.
Even squadrons of torpedo-armed Runabouts could be useful in a fleet battle, IMO. Although, I guess since we never saw them used that way, there must be some reason not to.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
There was a TNG episode mind you where the E-D finds a Galor getting it's arse handed to it by Maquis fighters.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Quite a leap of faith, to assume that a completely different delivery system could accomodate the exact same type of payload.SomosFuga wrote:True but this imaginary fighter does not have to use exactly the same type of torpedo a capital ship use, could be the same type of warhead but a quite different weapon, i still would like to call it "photon torpedo" because of its purpuse but this is spetially designed to be launched from a fighter.
You can't assume that analogy.. AFAIK, Photon torpedoes use somewhat different propulsion methods, launch methods, warheads, and guidance systems from modern RL wet torpedoes.SomosFuga wrote:If modern torpedoes can be launched from a variety of platforms which includes ships, submarines, choppers, fighters, and even missiles, why photon torpedoes couldn't?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Have we ever seen a torp fired in that fashion? IIRC i've only seen them "launched"
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
What's stopping them just making a purpose-built torp that can be fired by fighters?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
That would be my question.Rochey wrote:What's stopping them just making a purpose-built torp that can be fired by fighters?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Rochey wrote:What's stopping them just making a purpose-built torp that can be fired by fighters?
Probably the fact that such torpedo-bombers would be "one-and-done" affairs, and - as I mentioned - there are many factors contributing to the ineffectiveness of such things. Why build something that doesn't help, even if you can build it?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Yes, they get one volley and they're done. However a ship like a GCS could easily accommodate two or three dozen fighters in that huge hanger it has. While they might be one and done for very little cost you get the ability to lob between 48 and 144 torpedoes in a single volley at a target, maybe even more. The ability to go from putting 5 to 10 torps on target to that kind of volley is big. Given the size of starships a few fighters is a small investment for a potentially big return in a combat situation.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Seeing the apparently strong defenses a typical starship has against fighters (see Graham's post last page) I think you're talking about a relatively small number of craft getting close enough for an effective launch, and an even smaller number returning their pilots home.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
If you're just dealing with a single ship on ship action they would be of limited use. However in a large fleet engagements with numerous capital ships involved it's much more likely that these small one shot weapons wouldn't get targeted in favor of the many other ships present. I don't think anyone's suggesting they would be some kind of uber weapons so much as simply useful at times.
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
Why? photon torpedoes are probably the more common weapon in 24 century ST and they are use by lots of different species with quite different technology for a long period. Yes, all of them AFAIK use launchers but we can assume that those are completely different delivery systems, changing depending on the species and even on the age.Mikey wrote:Quite a leap of faith, to assume that a completely different delivery system could accomodate the exact same type of payload.SomosFuga wrote:True but this imaginary fighter does not have to use exactly the same type of torpedo a capital ship use, could be the same type of warhead but a quite different weapon, i still would like to call it "photon torpedo" because of its purpuse but this is spetially designed to be launched from a fighter.
Anyway I didn't say same payload, i said same type of warhead, but yes should be the similar payload too.
I'm not trying to launch/fire a pt from a present day fighter or helicopter but a 24 century platform especially designed for that purpuse.Mikey wrote:You can't assume that analogy.. AFAIK, Photon torpedoes use somewhat different propulsion methods, launch methods, warheads, and guidance systems from modern RL wet torpedoes.SomosFuga wrote:If modern torpedoes can be launched from a variety of platforms which includes ships, submarines, choppers, fighters, and even missiles, why photon torpedoes couldn't?
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Re: Info on the USS Kelvin
What is a typical starship? certainly a Sovereign or even a Galaxy aren't, they are the best we've seen in alpha and beta quadrants for the second half of the 24th century; a much more common ship could be something in the level of a K'T'Inga, Miranda, or Excelsior; though somebody could say those are very old classes so take an Oberth, Bird of Prey (100m long)Jemhadar Attack Ship, Romulan Scout, Talarian Scout, Talarian Warship, Kazon Raider, Hideki, even a Galor; all of them could be feasible targets for a small force of fighters.Mikey wrote:Seeing the apparently strong defenses a typical starship has against fighters (see Graham's post last page) I think you're talking about a relatively small number of craft getting close enough for an effective launch, and an even smaller number returning their pilots home.
Last edited by SomosFuga on Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!