Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
User avatar
IanKennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6232
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by IanKennedy »

The shuttles parked in a stack on the left and right side of the hanger bay. You see it in detail as the enter turn stern on to the hull and reverse into the 'parking' slot. There are two levels of these 'parking' slots within the hanger bay. In comparison with the original E-nil this is a marked size increase. The width of the original hanger bay could only just cope with two shuttles side by side. The new ship has enough room for the width of a shuttle plus the length of two shuttles added together.

As for the size of the shuttle, they are much larger than the original E-nil shuttles. In these new shuttles people can sit two-a-breast on each side of an 'isle', we see this as they are going up into orbit for the first time. That means they are as wide as five people sitting down. The old shuttles had enough room for one person to sit on each side of the 'isle', as seen in the Galileo Seven. There is also a larger shuttle which is able to seat about 7 people in a row. These rows are from side to side in the shuttle. We see this when Kirk is going to the academy for the first time.
email, ergo spam
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Tyyr »

...yeah, what he said.

I think with the two things we have to scale with, the bridge viewport and the shuttle bay I think it is fairly safe to say that the new big E is quite a bit larger than the classic version. Maybe not 900m but certainly more than 289m. The dual rows of viewports on the edge of the saucer harken back to the original Enterprise but you can't say what size those windows are. The shuttle bay and viewport both give a good reference point to scale from.
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Lazar »

Tyyr wrote:I think with the two things we have to scale with, the bridge viewport and the shuttle bay I think it is fairly safe to say that the new big E is quite a bit larger than the classic version. Maybe not 900m but certainly more than 289m.
I'd agree with that. (Just as an aside, the TMP version was larger as well - 305 m compared to 289 m, by DITL's figures - which I think was largely because they increased the diameter of the saucer section.)
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Lazar »

One more thing: as an experiment, we could try to scale the ship using the visible docking ports, on the assumption that they're the same size as the ones in TMP, and then see if the resulting figure sounds good.

Image
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by stitch626 »

One thing I must say is the torp launcher is much smaller in relation to the ship.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Graham Kennedy »

If the port is 7 feet in diameter then the engineering hull is about 150 feet in diameter.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by stitch626 »

That seems a little... small. I think. I'm not good with feet, I think in meters (blame physics for that).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Tyyr »

I don't think it's a docking port though. Didn't Kirk's escape pod eject from that port on the interconnect?
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Nickswitz »

Yeah, it did.
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by stitch626 »

That pod was really small though. No more than a couple meters wide.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Aaron »

Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Tyyr »

He's getting about the size I was for the shuttles I think. Not really surprised. I actually like the larger ship.
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Lazar »

He does seem to make a pretty good case for the ~700 m figure. Although I have a little trouble reconciling the suggested 4-deck saucer rim with the shots from the film: with the pattern of "gray band ~ windows ~ gray band ~ windows ~ gray band" that you can see in my above post, it seems like 5 decks would actually work better there.

Anyway, I suppose I could grow to like the larger ship (especially if I had some cutaways, cross sections or MSDs to sink my teeth into), but for me the TMP Enterprise will always remain the most sensible and beautiful starship ever in science fiction. ;)
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I'm holding off on this. I want to see a high resolution 5 view render of the actual CGI model used in the movie; big enough that we can scale things on it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
LaughingCheese
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Post by LaughingCheese »

GrahamKennedy wrote:I'm holding off on this. I want to see a high resolution 5 view render of the actual CGI model used in the movie; big enough that we can scale things on it.
IF we ever get one, I wouldn't wait up for it.... :?

Whatever its dimensions, I still think it was an awesome movie. :lol:
Post Reply