Excelsior Class Discussion
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
I like the rugged bulky look. It looks more functional than almost anything else the feds have thrown out. That said, I like the Ambassadors too. I think the Nacelles look a little big, and but its in proportion with the rest of the ship.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Deep is right - we've seen the incredible of acheivements of a Connie, because it was the hero ship of the franchise. The service life of the Excelsior was far superior, as was its upgrade-ability (is that a word?) In order to refit the Connie to TMP-spec, it needed to be completely rebuilt from the keel up. The Lakota refit of the Excelsior used an extant spaceframe.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Actually we don't KNOW for sure what the hell the lifespan of an Excelsior really is. If they contructed new ships constantly, they COULD have been replacing them as they wore out, thus the batches we see in TNG the 2nd or even 3rd and last generation of those ships. And before we start about the Excelsior mention Chakotay made, we already know that Starfleet recycles names.
Now, don't get me wrong. Just the name "Excelsior" can give me shivers thinking about that ship. She "looks" friggin huge AND powerful. And seriously shortening the neck and tucking in the nacelle struts were tactically great ideas.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth
Now, don't get me wrong. Just the name "Excelsior" can give me shivers thinking about that ship. She "looks" friggin huge AND powerful. And seriously shortening the neck and tucking in the nacelle struts were tactically great ideas.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
So what came of the transwarp project? From TSFS you sort of got the impression that it had already been tested, and that it would have worked if Scotty hadn't sabotaged it.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Nobody really knows. GK has a rather good theory on the main site, but I don't think we ever found out for sure.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
My personnal theory is that the "transwarp" mentioned in ST III is actually the TNG-era warp drive. We know they recalibrated the scale and that, at least nominally, everything got a lot faster - what better reason to do so than a new technological application of warp theory?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
That actually makes a tremendous amount of sense.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Maybe "transwarp" is just a term they give to certain other tech that is different from, and travels faster than "warp"?
Otherwise, why would they bother differentiating Borg "transwarp"?
Otherwise, why would they bother differentiating Borg "transwarp"?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
I like seafort's idea. Yeah, I just sad that so get the fuck over it.
It means that my most loved class of all didn't fail but was just delayed. Now the Excelsior can take even more credit as the greatest class ever!
It means that my most loved class of all didn't fail but was just delayed. Now the Excelsior can take even more credit as the greatest class ever!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Aye, it makes no sense that Starfleet would pull the plug after one failure of a system that must have been tested and shown to work numerous times before. That it became the TNG era drive (at which point, the designation "transwarp" was given to the next hurdle) is the most sensible explaination, IMO.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Oh, how sad that the Excelsior gets the credit because of excessive recycling of the model (sighs dramatically).Deepcrush wrote:I like seafort's idea. Yeah, I just sad that so get the f**k over it.
It means that my most loved class of all didn't fail but was just delayed. Now the Excelsior can take even more credit as the greatest class ever!
But by that argument then the Oberth class is the greatest exploration vessel of all time and the Klingon Bird of Prey the most perfect ship design ever, since there are at least three different scales for it.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Not really. Its because it is, after nearly a hundred years, still able to act as a front line starship. It was the test bed for the current warp drive tech that has lasted for eighty years. It has the ability to be upgraded to equal the UFP's first purpose built warship. This along with a trusted hull design that was produced in massive numbers that have survived. Along with avoiding many of the problems that the GCS ( a much later design) came with. So there we have a system that was superior in many ways to designs that came decades later.Oh, how sad that the Excelsior gets the credit because of excessive recycling of the model (sighs dramatically).
Dispite your reaching with the whole comment. This wouldn't be a bad stance. A ship that is one of three classes that have lasted for half the life time of the UFP. Seeing how its still in use and still able to make the grade for current commanders is a good sign. Small, cheap and able. Always a good sign.But by that argument then the Oberth class is the greatest exploration vessel of all time
I think we covered this before but we came out with a similar thought, though not as extreme as you place it. The BoP is a cheap, long lasting, long range, hard hitting (for its size) ship with a small crew requirment and simple upkeep. Where its not perfect, it is still a very good design that has paid for itself many times over.and the Klingon Bird of Prey the most perfect ship design ever, since there are at least three different scales for it.
There's more to a ship then just when and how often its used. Where we have the OOU call of its a nice looking model that they just kept on using. IU there is often a reason(s) we can draw from as I pointed out above.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
The main thrust of my point-and apologies if I was not clear-is the only reason these three designs are so long lasting comes down to simple economics and not due to fan popularity or producer preference. They were laying around and available. Same reason the Romulans suddenly started using the Klingon warships in TOS, because the original Romulan model was no longer available.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
Yes but that is an OOU example, do you want to argue that or IU concerns?katefan wrote:The main thrust of my point-and apologies if I was not clear-is the only reason these three designs are so long lasting comes down to simple economics and not due to fan popularity or producer preference. They were laying around and available. Same reason the Romulans suddenly started using the Klingon warships in TOS, because the original Romulan model was no longer available.
Anyways, I figure the Warbird fits the needs of the Romulan fleet as they define them. Think about it, they have two major competators; the UFP and the Klingons, who seem in no hurry to curbstomp them. That pretty much leaves the Romulans free to do whatever the hell they want elsewhere, the Warbird may be a perfectly viable warship on every front they have. We know they aren't expanding towards the KE and the UFP and we know next to nothing about whats on the other side of them, they may be very well steamrolling their way in the opposite direction.
Re: Excelsior Class Discussion
I suppose, though, if we had to employ all IU concerns, though, then the D7 is the ultimate warship, since it lasted from Enterprise to DS9. :/ But I see your point.Yes but that is an OOU example, do you want to argue that or IU concerns?