Excelsior Class Discussion

The Original Series
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Reliant121 »

I like the rugged bulky look. It looks more functional than almost anything else the feds have thrown out. That said, I like the Ambassadors too. I think the Nacelles look a little big, and but its in proportion with the rest of the ship.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Mikey »

Deep is right - we've seen the incredible of acheivements of a Connie, because it was the hero ship of the franchise. The service life of the Excelsior was far superior, as was its upgrade-ability (is that a word?) In order to refit the Connie to TMP-spec, it needed to be completely rebuilt from the keel up. The Lakota refit of the Excelsior used an extant spaceframe.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Mark »

Actually we don't KNOW for sure what the hell the lifespan of an Excelsior really is. If they contructed new ships constantly, they COULD have been replacing them as they wore out, thus the batches we see in TNG the 2nd or even 3rd and last generation of those ships. And before we start about the Excelsior mention Chakotay made, we already know that Starfleet recycles names.

Now, don't get me wrong. Just the name "Excelsior" can give me shivers thinking about that ship. She "looks" friggin huge AND powerful. And seriously shortening the neck and tucking in the nacelle struts were tactically great ideas.

Anyway, that's my two cents worth
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Lazar »

So what came of the transwarp project? From TSFS you sort of got the impression that it had already been tested, and that it would have worked if Scotty hadn't sabotaged it.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Mark »

Nobody really knows. GK has a rather good theory on the main site, but I don't think we ever found out for sure.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Captain Seafort »

My personnal theory is that the "transwarp" mentioned in ST III is actually the TNG-era warp drive. We know they recalibrated the scale and that, at least nominally, everything got a lot faster - what better reason to do so than a new technological application of warp theory?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Lazar »

That actually makes a tremendous amount of sense.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Maybe "transwarp" is just a term they give to certain other tech that is different from, and travels faster than "warp"?

Otherwise, why would they bother differentiating Borg "transwarp"?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

I like seafort's idea. Yeah, I just sad that so get the fuck over it.

It means that my most loved class of all didn't fail but was just delayed. Now the Excelsior can take even more credit as the greatest class ever!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Aye, it makes no sense that Starfleet would pull the plug after one failure of a system that must have been tested and shown to work numerous times before. That it became the TNG era drive (at which point, the designation "transwarp" was given to the next hurdle) is the most sensible explaination, IMO.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by katefan »

Deepcrush wrote:I like seafort's idea. Yeah, I just sad that so get the f**k over it.

It means that my most loved class of all didn't fail but was just delayed. Now the Excelsior can take even more credit as the greatest class ever!
Oh, how sad that the Excelsior gets the credit because of excessive recycling of the model (sighs dramatically).

But by that argument then the Oberth class is the greatest exploration vessel of all time and the Klingon Bird of Prey the most perfect ship design ever, since there are at least three different scales for it.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Deepcrush »

Oh, how sad that the Excelsior gets the credit because of excessive recycling of the model (sighs dramatically).
Not really. Its because it is, after nearly a hundred years, still able to act as a front line starship. It was the test bed for the current warp drive tech that has lasted for eighty years. It has the ability to be upgraded to equal the UFP's first purpose built warship. This along with a trusted hull design that was produced in massive numbers that have survived. Along with avoiding many of the problems that the GCS ( a much later design) came with. So there we have a system that was superior in many ways to designs that came decades later.
But by that argument then the Oberth class is the greatest exploration vessel of all time
Dispite your reaching with the whole comment. This wouldn't be a bad stance. A ship that is one of three classes that have lasted for half the life time of the UFP. Seeing how its still in use and still able to make the grade for current commanders is a good sign. Small, cheap and able. Always a good sign.
and the Klingon Bird of Prey the most perfect ship design ever, since there are at least three different scales for it.
I think we covered this before but we came out with a similar thought, though not as extreme as you place it. The BoP is a cheap, long lasting, long range, hard hitting (for its size) ship with a small crew requirment and simple upkeep. Where its not perfect, it is still a very good design that has paid for itself many times over.

There's more to a ship then just when and how often its used. Where we have the OOU call of its a nice looking model that they just kept on using. IU there is often a reason(s) we can draw from as I pointed out above.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by katefan »

The main thrust of my point-and apologies if I was not clear-is the only reason these three designs are so long lasting comes down to simple economics and not due to fan popularity or producer preference. They were laying around and available. Same reason the Romulans suddenly started using the Klingon warships in TOS, because the original Romulan model was no longer available.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by Aaron »

katefan wrote:The main thrust of my point-and apologies if I was not clear-is the only reason these three designs are so long lasting comes down to simple economics and not due to fan popularity or producer preference. They were laying around and available. Same reason the Romulans suddenly started using the Klingon warships in TOS, because the original Romulan model was no longer available.
Yes but that is an OOU example, do you want to argue that or IU concerns?

Anyways, I figure the Warbird fits the needs of the Romulan fleet as they define them. Think about it, they have two major competators; the UFP and the Klingons, who seem in no hurry to curbstomp them. That pretty much leaves the Romulans free to do whatever the hell they want elsewhere, the Warbird may be a perfectly viable warship on every front they have. We know they aren't expanding towards the KE and the UFP and we know next to nothing about whats on the other side of them, they may be very well steamrolling their way in the opposite direction.
User avatar
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Excelsior Class Discussion

Post by katefan »

Yes but that is an OOU example, do you want to argue that or IU concerns?
I suppose, though, if we had to employ all IU concerns, though, then the D7 is the ultimate warship, since it lasted from Enterprise to DS9. :/ But I see your point.
Locked