Page 3 of 3
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:59 pm
by Lt. Staplic
kind of, am I the only one that knows the Ancient Egyptian creation myth?
according to their mythology, Atmun literaly masturbated the universe into existance.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:11 pm
by Mikey
Maybe the Hirogen are Orks.
As far as signal degradation, I repeat - degradation would affect amplitude; how could it affect signal speed?
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:00 pm
by Mark
Maybe Hirogen are shaved Chakats
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:05 pm
by Lt. Staplic
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:19 pm
by shran
Obviously a higher form, because they are bipedal species, whereas the Chakats were quadrapeds.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:08 am
by Graham Kennedy
shran wrote:Obviously a higher form, because they are bipedal species, whereas the Chakats were quadrapeds.
That, and the Hirogen aren't drooling morons.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:31 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Aye, they can hold a rational conversation.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:03 pm
by Mikey
GrahamKennedy wrote:shran wrote:Obviously a higher form, because they are bipedal species, whereas the Chakats were quadrapeds.
That, and the Hirogen aren't drooling morons.
Well, they obviously genetically engineered themselves to be so.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:13 pm
by Mark
Well, they could, since they have opposable thumbs.
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:26 pm
by Lt. Staplic
