Favorite Movie of All Time
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Wasn't that the one with John Wayne and Ricky Nelson? Great film, but not the best western - what about The Magnificent Seven? - which, by the way, is not as good as the original film it was based on, Seven Samurai by Akira Kurosawa. If you ever get the chance, see it!
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Has an uncut version of seven samurai been released on dvd yet? i'm a big akira kurosawa fan myself -- if you've never watched his movies, you should check them out. its an interesting perspective through postwar japanese film that modern japan has almost ignored in its modern films, not to mention its modern politics and cultural perceptions.Mikey wrote:Wasn't that the one with John Wayne and Ricky Nelson? Great film, but not the best western - what about The Magnificent Seven? - which, by the way, is not as good as the original film it was based on, Seven Samurai by Akira Kurosawa. If you ever get the chance, see it!
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
My favorites are Close Encounters Of the Third Kind, The Big Lebowski, The Fountain, and American Beauty. Being on a Star Trek forum, I'm surprised that more of us don't mention Star Trek. But for me it's more of the ST mythology as a whole than any one movie or series that I find so appealing. And it's the same way with The Lord Of The Rings, and Tolkien.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I agree with your take on the "backstory" as being what makes 'Trek, Tlkien, etc. so great. On that note, am I the only LotR books fan who thought that Jackson's films were complete, painful-to-watch crap?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
It seems so. I liked them. Granted it was never going to be as good as the book but it was still dman good. i've also read the books 6 times so know my way around the stroy quite well.On that note, am I the only LotR books fan who thought that Jackson's films were complete, painful-to-watch crap?
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
The films were actualy far better than I thought they would be. My first impresion was that they were going to be like that horific animated film they made of the first two.
Although they weren't perfect, I thought the films did as good as they could.
Although they weren't perfect, I thought the films did as good as they could.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Really... I thought the films did an absolutely perfect job of completely removing the element of Tolkien that held the greatest attraction - that is, the backstory, the languages, the history of the Men of the West, the history of Sauron as a minor demigod, and teh resultant feeling of the contemporary events being just the tip of the iceberg that was the events of the prior two ages.
Even without having read The Silmarillion et. al., one could still very clearly get that feeling from the books.
Even without having read The Silmarillion et. al., one could still very clearly get that feeling from the books.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13110
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
I liked the LOTR movies, but I don't compare them to the books. I haven't read the trilogy in a while.
Won't list the ST movies, since they're in another category...
Transformers: The movie (1986)
Transformers: Live-action
Big Trouble in Little China
Enter the Dragon
The OT
The Dark Crystal
Mortal Kombat
The Longest Day
Spider-man
Won't list the ST movies, since they're in another category...
Transformers: The movie (1986)
Transformers: Live-action
Big Trouble in Little China
Enter the Dragon
The OT
The Dark Crystal
Mortal Kombat
The Longest Day
Spider-man
I have often had this discussion. I've read all the works, LOTR, Silmarillion, Histories of Middle-earth, Unfinished Tales, Hobbit, and even the Letters of JRRT (not Children of Hurin yet, though). I knew the film couldn't be as good as the books, but I didn't expect them to be.Mikey wrote:Really... I thought the films did an absolutely perfect job of completely removing the element of Tolkien that held the greatest attraction - that is, the backstory, the languages, the history of the Men of the West, the history of Sauron as a minor demigod, and teh resultant feeling of the contemporary events being just the tip of the iceberg that was the events of the prior two ages.
Even without having read The Silmarillion et. al., one could still very clearly get that feeling from the books.
I take a different outlook on the films - that they're good as films. Just imagine them as films, and not based on anything else. They're pretty awesome that way, but when you start comparing everything - of course Tolkien's languages (there was a decent amount of Quenya and Sindarin, even a couple of words of Khuzdul), and the more minor characters; Bombadil, Glorfindel (too much Arwen), Beregrond... The history of Men, and of Sauron, though, don't really fall into LOTR. The history of Men is really the Akallabeth, and Sauron is just all over.
I think the fims are brilliant, but just not comparable to the bokos.
80085
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
I suppose I am being somewhat unfair; it's just that part of me wonders, "why bother?" I felt the same when I watched the film version of Michael Crichton's Jurassic Park. I mean, the turned a phenomenal, intelligent sci-fi book into a run-away-and-shoot-stuff movie.Thorin wrote:I have often had this discussion. ...
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer