Page 174 of 228
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:48 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Looks like Katy Perry again to me.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:52 pm
by Mikey
Mos def. All 4 of 'em.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:19 am
by thelordharry
He kissed a girl and he liked it.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:01 pm
by Tyyr
The only thoughts that second pic prompts are dirty ones.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:47 pm
by thelordharry
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:56 pm
by Mikey
No Lynda Carter, indeed. And pants?! WTF?
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:24 pm
by Graham Kennedy
I officially declare this movie WINO. Wonder woman In Name Only.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:59 pm
by Mikey
GrahamKennedy wrote:I officially declare this movie WINO. Wonder woman In Name Only.
Hmm. When I was officially declared "wino," I believe the term referred to something else.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:35 am
by Vic
And scrawny, good thing it is a magical belt providing all of that strength.
If you're going to show that much cleavage, ditch the pants and show some leg too. And, hit the weights woman
you are way too soft. At 5'11" she at least has some height.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:53 am
by thelordharry
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:42 pm
by Tyyr
Am I alone in thinking Wonder Woman is a superhero that's not going to translate over terribly well to today? Especially keeping her in that kind of costume?
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:38 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Tyyr wrote:Am I alone in thinking Wonder Woman is a superhero that's not going to translate over terribly well to today? Especially keeping her in that kind of costume?
Nope.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:52 pm
by Tyyr
They really should have overhauled, massively. This... is a really bad joke.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:22 pm
by Graham Kennedy
They're a bit stuck really. Frankly many comics have bizzare stuff in them that the average moviegoer wouldn't accept. Superhero movies have to strike a balance, change things enough for the average moviegoer to accept it, whilst keeping it similar enough that the comic fans will turn out and buy your merchandising, too.
To fit modern sensibilities they'd have to redraw Wonder Woman so much it wouldn't really be Wonder Woman any more. You drive the fans off that way.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:30 pm
by Tyyr
I don't think so. I dunno, maybe I'm not a hard core comic geek but to me it's one thing to accept something in a comic. It's another to see it on live action TV. Hell if you want to get serious about it a lot of comic characters have been trending towards more realistic/practical get ups and moving away from the spandex/latex past.
The most important thing to remember about fanboys is that you will never, ever make them happy. It's not possible. Don't even try. Make something for the general audience and let the fanboys bitch and moan about how it's ruined forever. They're going to anyways and there aren't enough of them to make something economically viable. You've got to get non-comic book fans watching or it'll bomb no matter how many fanboys are watching.