Pictures from the new TOS movie

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:08 am

No, but I should have forseen it.

Lt. Staplic · Post by **Lt. Staplic** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:13 am

I knew it would!

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:23 am

payback's a b*tch ain't it?

Or, I'm sorry: revenge is a dish best served cold isn't it?

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:24 am

You are BOTH rather enjoying this, huh?

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:29 am

A little bit.

To be honest, I thought your first comment was your payback to me for making my comment in the Ent. Forum, about how the station was featured in the movie. Either way, I think we both counter-manuevered each other rather well.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:34 am

mwhittington · Post by **mwhittington** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:26 am

There is no steroid conspiracy, just athletes lucky enough to be breathed on by Chuck Norris.
Chuck Norris is to blame for China's population problem. He attended a martial arts convention in China and every woman within 1000 square miles instantly became pregnant.

Post by **Teaos** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:49 am

kostmayer wrote:Not too keen. Like the new Bridge, its just a little too Galaxy Quest for my tastes.

Ah thats what it reminds me of.

Captain Picard's Hair · Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:57 am

Let's hope that there aren't those smashing... things... on the way to the Crystalline Bridge.

On a serious note, the biggest problem with the new E is her too "futuristic" deflector - but that is still quite defensible OOU, given that the TOS Enterprise was a product of '60's SFX and Dorothy ain't in '60's tech no more. This is the whole reason TOS has been remastered, after all!

I won't concern myself overly much with the "look," given the 40 year gulf in SFX we're talking about. I'll concern myself overly much with how much the new film upholds the good name of Trek in story (and the continuity stuff)

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:56 am

Yuck. That is quite possibly the ugliest non-Frankenstein ship I've ever seen in Trek. The saucer looks good, but everything below and aft of that - horrible. It looks unbalanced. Why couldn't they have taken some tips from "Trials and Tribble-ations" or TOS-R for crying out loud?

Lt. Staplic · Post by **Lt. Staplic** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:53 pm

Mark wrote:You are BOTH rather enjoying this, huh?

Well Mark, you have three things working against you here.

You've gotten us to many times to count

You're old we're not, teens unite

Your and admiral, Teen's Unite Against Authority!!!

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:17 pm

New pc thread merged with the old one. There're already far too many STXI threads floating around, we don't need two on the same subject.

That said, that's one damn ugly ship. What have they done to my beloved Connie?

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:52 pm

Where are the pics for the new thread? i cant find them >.<

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:54 pm

There's a link posted on the previous page.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:00 pm

I looked at it...you have got to be shitting me, right?

That is an abomination. not only is it fuck ugly, it looks like a 25th version of the connie

Pictures from the new TOS movie

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: New Pictures

Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie

Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie

Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie

Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie