The potential for refits

Deep Space Nine
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Mikey »

stitch626 wrote:Seriously kidding.
Is that like "jumbo shrimp" or "courageous Frenchman?"
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Teaos »

The Intrepid is one of the newest designs out there, hardly needs a refit.

It was never ment to be a fighter, it is plenty strong for its size.

I wouldnt bother upgrading it for another 20 years apart from the usual minor upgrades all ships seem to do on the go.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

So then the Intrepid is a no go. The Akira is a maybe, possible but not needed. The Nebula we're already covering it two other threads. The Excelsior has been done to death.

GCS, I can't remember if we covered this one or not? :roll:
Really though, the GCS is just not needed when compared to the Upgraded Neb we're working on.

Sov? She's the new toy of the fleet but is there anything anyone would change?

What else is there?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Teaos »

The debate on if the GCS needs upgrades is tied into what its used for.

If they use it for what is was designed for, exploring, I think its pretty ok as is, fit the obvious problems (which already seem to have been) and then do the minor upgrades all ships do and send it into deep space.

If how ever they continue to abuse it as a Battleship... overhaul it.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

I would doubt that its life as a battleship has much futher to go. The Sov is a far far far far far more able ship at a fraction of the mass (ie cost in ST terms) and she's a battle cruiser. Plus, you can now (as we are doing) upgrade a Nebula Class to be superior to that of a GCS.

Oh, on a side note. I say toss the Saber and Norway classes. They really don't fill a need.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Tsukiyumi »

How do we know the Sov is a fraction of the mass of a GCS? A fraction of the volume, yes, but if she's made from denser (therefore sturdier) materials, she might have more mass packed into a smaller volume.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

Tsukiyumi wrote:How do we know the Sov is a fraction of the mass of a GCS? A fraction of the volume, yes, but if she's made from denser (therefore sturdier) materials, she might have more mass packed into a smaller volume.
Going by that line of thought, SF would have to start using materials about three times the weight. Also, weight does not make a material stronger.

Its not a bad thought but it just doesn't fit.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Tsukiyumi »

I didn't say weight, I said mass. :wink:

20 cubic meters of jello would have less mass than 1 cubic meter of aluminum, for example.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Teaos »

Unless the jello was going really fast, then its mass would increase :P
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

Tsukiyumi wrote:How do we know the Sov is a fraction of the mass of a GCS? A fraction of the volume, yes, but if she's made from denser (therefore sturdier) materials, she might have more mass packed into a smaller volume.
Density effects weight.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Mikey »

Practically on Earth, density affects weight. In space, weight means nothing. And it is theoretically possible to have a non-complememntary ratio between mass and weight. Density is defined as mass per unit volume; weight only figures inasmuch as on Earth, mass and weight are generally closely related.

Be that as it may; there's really nowhere to go with upgrading the Sov, past what's already been done between FC and NEM. The GCS has been upgraded close to its limit in the DW upgraded models; perhaps the phasers could be upgraded, but with the advent of the Sov I think it would be beating a dead horse. Saber and Norway? There is a need, but I think that need has been filled by the New Orleans-class and Intrepid-class. I'd keep the Nova-class, because otherwise there's no dedicated research vessel, but I'm afraid that there's precious little that can be done with it. Perhaps new coil tech or a slightly longer nacelle could provide a little better escape speed, or support a bit of armor.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

My thoughts had the New Orleans class replaced by the Akira.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Teaos »

Thats what I thought to...
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Mikey »

Deepcrush wrote:My thoughts had the New Orleans class replaced by the Akira.
Really? The New Orleans-class was a little thing, and only had the three tubes - they just looked big because they were mounted externally. I had that pegged more as a picket and patrol craft, kind of like a PT boat. The Akira was a ship-of-the-line comapred to the New Orelans' sloop.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: The potential for refits

Post by Deepcrush »

The Akira is just a larger and more potent form of the New Orleans. Both are torp boats that are best used at range instead of up close.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply