Page 17 of 24

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:09 pm
by Deepcrush
The might as in the powerhouse of the US Army or the might as in the division of New York. :lol:

But either way, the US being held off by a country of equal size under the protection of the most powerful nation on earth at the time vs... England lossing to a group of colonies. Nice that you kept it so close together. :P

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:10 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Mark wrote:Ahh yes Crush. Tempers were indeed flaring. Even some light name calling as I recall.
And my conscious is completely clean for a change. The tempers and name calling was not started by me, nor did I participate in it.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:11 pm
by Deepcrush
Conscious? :?

I don't understand...

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:16 pm
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:But either way, the US being held off by a country of equal size under the protection of the most powerful nation on earth at the time
Britain wasn't involved in the opening phase of the war - the US army was kicked out solely due to the efforts of part-time local volunteers.
vs... England lossing to a group of colonies. Nice that you kept it so close together. :P
Colonies that had the support of the rest of the great powers. The most powerful nation losing to an alliance of the second, third and fourth most powerful isn't too shabby a showing.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:28 pm
by Deepcrush
Britain wasn't involved in the opening phase of the war - the US army was kicked out solely due to the efforts of part-time local volunteers.
What do you think the US troops were? :lol:

PS, Britain was involved in the opening parts of the war. British troops raided a number of US towns on the eastern shore.
Colonies that had the support of the rest of the great powers. The most powerful nation losing to an alliance of the second, third and fourth most powerful isn't too shabby a showing.
We had the support of france but that came late in the war. England should have won the war long before that time. Spain came to war but wasn't really that interested with anything other then grabbing a little land. England misjudged the war and it cost them dearly. The same was the problem for France in the Seven Years War.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:30 pm
by Blackstar the Chakat
Deepcrush wrote:Conscious? :?

I don't understand...
I'm sorry did I make a typo?

I'm trying to say that thing that most people have that makes them feel guilty or something. I understand it might be an alien concept to you though :P

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:32 pm
by Deepcrush
I've felt guilty before, but just because i'm guilty of something doesn't mean it has to effect me in anyway. :P

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:47 pm
by Mikey
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:Conscious? :?

I don't understand...
I'm sorry did I make a typo?

I'm trying to say that thing that most people have that makes them feel guilty or something. I understand it might be an alien concept to you though :P
"conscious" means "awake" or "aware." "Conscience" means the part of the superego that directs us towards our morality.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:12 pm
by JudgeKing
Captain Seafort wrote:1812 - the might of the US regular army stormed across the boarder and was promptly sent packing by Isaac Brock and Tecumseh.
Those were Brits and Native Americans, not French.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:34 pm
by Captain Seafort
Yep - that was in response to Deep asking when the US lost to Canada.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:23 am
by Deepcrush
That war ended in a draw, not a defeat.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:15 am
by Captain Seafort
Deepcrush wrote:That war ended in a draw, not a defeat.
The US failed to achieve its strategic objectives - the annexation of Canada. Therefore it lost.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:44 pm
by Aaron
Captain Seafort wrote:
The US failed to achieve its strategic objectives - the annexation of Canada. Therefore it lost.
IIRC the US alos lost Detroit and had a fair amount of Washington DC burned to the ground and thousands of slaves lost.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:29 pm
by Deepcrush
Captain Seafort wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:That war ended in a draw, not a defeat.
The US failed to achieve its strategic objectives - the annexation of Canada. Therefore it lost.
A failed advance doesn't mean defeat, it means you didn't achive a goal. That tends to happen in war.

Re: USS Stargazer

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:46 pm
by Sionnach Glic
I'd call failing to achieve your objectives a defeat.