Page 154 of 228

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:02 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive :) It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it. :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:25 pm
by Mikey
IanKennedy wrote:
thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive :) It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it. :)
If you want to step up the acting ability, that is.

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:26 pm
by thelordharry
Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world :lol: However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:35 pm
by IanKennedy
Mikey wrote:
IanKennedy wrote:
thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive :) It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it. :)
If you want to step up the acting ability, that is.
OK, a hunk of 4 x 2 balsa wood and paint a pretty picture on it. Is that lightweight enough? :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:36 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world :lol: However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:40 pm
by thelordharry
IanKennedy wrote:
thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world :lol: However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all :)
Have you been on the old blood wine again, Ian? :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:44 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:
IanKennedy wrote:
thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world :lol: However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all :)
Have you been on the old blood wine again, Ian? :)
Who me, <hic> :)

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:12 pm
by thelordharry
Be watchful of Ian Kennedy in his velvet prime. Deeply he'll swallow from your finest kegs, Then swiftly be gone, leaving bitter dregs. Ah, bitter dregs.

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:02 am
by Deepcrush
thelordharry wrote:Be watchful of Ian Kennedy in his velvet prime. Deeply he'll swallow from your finest kegs, Then swiftly be gone, leaving bitter dregs. Ah, bitter dregs.
:poke:

Just waiting for Mikey or Tsu or Mark to hop on this! :lol:

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:09 am
by Mikey
Sorry, I was confused. I didn't know they called them "kegs" over there. :P

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:04 am
by Tsukiyumi
Mikey wrote:Sorry, I was confused. I didn't know they called them "kegs" over there. :P
I call mine a keg. Or "Dragon", or "loaf".

Whatever.



:P

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:05 pm
by Graham Kennedy
I don't know if it would be legal, but couldn't they just use a cardboard cutout of Megan Fox for the movie? It would look the same, act about as well, be cheaper...

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:30 pm
by Mikey
I don't know if there's much cheaper than her out there... ha-cha-cha!

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:03 pm
by thelordharry
GrahamKennedy wrote:I don't know if it would be legal, but couldn't they just use a cardboard cutout of Megan Fox for the movie? It would look the same, act about as well, be cheaper...
Help me with my car, Mister?
Image

Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:15 pm
by Tyyr
I've said it before, say what you want about her but unattractive she is not.