Page 154 of 228
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:02 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive
It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:25 pm
by Mikey
IanKennedy wrote:thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive
It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it.
If you want to step up the acting ability, that is.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:26 pm
by thelordharry
Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world
However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:35 pm
by IanKennedy
Mikey wrote:IanKennedy wrote:thelordharry wrote:Well, of course, she IS a supermodel and you don't get to be one of those unless you're incredibly attractive
It's just that I think she'll have a hard time trying to replace someone like Megan Fox in the role.
Well if you want someone to replace her get a hunk of 4 x 2 and paint a pretty picture on it.
If you want to step up the acting ability, that is.
OK, a hunk of 4 x 2 balsa wood and paint a pretty picture on it. Is that lightweight enough?
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:36 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world
However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:40 pm
by thelordharry
IanKennedy wrote:thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world
However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all
Have you been on the old blood wine again, Ian?
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:44 pm
by IanKennedy
thelordharry wrote:IanKennedy wrote:thelordharry wrote:Well sure, she's not the greatest actress in the world
However, I guess what I'm trying to say is that she's not in the movie to provide acting gravitas but to encourage the heterosexual male populace who naturally think with a certain appendage to go see the movie where she'll be wearing hotpants and bending over a lot. I think her carefully crafted and managed image (striking good looks, great body and a 'little bit of the wrong about her') accomplish that moreso than say, a 'vanilla' supermodel.
Yes, but since when as what you intended got anything to do with what gets written in response, this is DITL after all
Have you been on the old blood wine again, Ian?
Who me, <hic>
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:12 pm
by thelordharry
Be watchful of Ian Kennedy in his velvet prime. Deeply he'll swallow from your finest kegs, Then swiftly be gone, leaving bitter dregs. Ah, bitter dregs.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:02 am
by Deepcrush
thelordharry wrote:Be watchful of Ian Kennedy in his velvet prime. Deeply he'll swallow from your finest kegs, Then swiftly be gone, leaving bitter dregs. Ah, bitter dregs.
Just waiting for Mikey or Tsu or Mark to hop on this!
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:09 am
by Mikey
Sorry, I was confused. I didn't know they called them "kegs" over there.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:04 am
by Tsukiyumi
Mikey wrote:Sorry, I was confused. I didn't know they called them "kegs" over there.
I call mine a keg. Or "Dragon", or "loaf".
Whatever.
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:05 pm
by Graham Kennedy
I don't know if it would be legal, but couldn't they just use a cardboard cutout of Megan Fox for the movie? It would look the same, act about as well, be cheaper...
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:30 pm
by Mikey
I don't know if there's much cheaper than her out there...
ha-cha-cha!
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:03 pm
by thelordharry
GrahamKennedy wrote:I don't know if it would be legal, but couldn't they just use a cardboard cutout of Megan Fox for the movie? It would look the same, act about as well, be cheaper...
Help me with my car, Mister?
Re: Sci-Fi Babes/Hunks
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:15 pm
by Tyyr
I've said it before, say what you want about her but unattractive she is not.