Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 3:56 pm
Whatever, I don't want to get into this arguement again.Teaos wrote:I'd say their zombie like walk is a bigger probelm than their lack of kinetic shields.
www.ditl.org
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://mail.ditl.org/forum/
You're a Captain,you get to pick your starship. Which class?
Page 16 of 71
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:03 pm
Which one? The one where we proved that Borg Drones aren't equipped with KE shields, or the one where you insisted that pissing valuable resources away doesn't matter in a war?Whatever, I don't want to get into this arguement again.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:26 pm
The Borg one. And when did we argue the second one?Rochey wrote:Which one? The one where we proved that Borg Drones aren't equipped with KE shields, or the one where you insisted that pissing valuable resources away doesn't matter in a war?Whatever, I don't want to get into this arguement again.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
I vaugly recall the second one but I cant remember where or when.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:44 pm
Yes, I can see why you might not want to get back into that debate again. What with being shown to be wrong, and all that.The Borg one.
It was later on in that same thread, where you pretty much went "well, it doesn't matter if they don't shield the drone's because they're expendable".And when did we argue the second one?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:02 pm
Don't you dare call me childish after pulling that out.Rochey wrote:Yes, I can see why you might not want to get back into that debate again. What with being shown to be wrong, and all that.
Can we please find something new to argue about?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:03 pm
Seconded.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:04 pm
I'm only stating the facts. And besides, I don't think I ever called you 'childish' at all.Don't you dare call me childish after pulling that out.
Feel free. You're the one who brought it up, not me.Can we please find something new to argue about?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:09 pm
No that was Teaos who brought up the ridiculous idea of building combat robots armed with swords and shields and that they would be remotely effective against the Borg.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:16 pm
Actualy, they would be rather effective against the Borg. Considering how they can't block KE attacks, and all that.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:46 pm
Now, I know that we've never discussed this topic before 
... how about that baseball/hockey/hurling/soccer/cricket team?
... how about that baseball/hockey/hurling/soccer/cricket team?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:02 pm
I say the Milwaukee Brewers are gonna go all the way this year. They were only 3 games short last year of getting into the National League Chapionship series, and I think they could take the world series this year.Mikey wrote:Now, I know that we've never discussed this topic before
... how about that baseball/hockey/hurling/soccer/cricket team?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:28 pm
Do you just get bored and DECIDE to start up old interminable fights?Rochey wrote:Yes, I can see why you might not want to get back into that debate again. What with being shown to be wrong, and all that.The Borg one.
It was later on in that same thread, where you pretty much went "well, it doesn't matter if they don't shield the drone's because they're expendable".And when did we argue the second one?
Sorry Rochey but this was a total troll.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:35 pm
How's it trolling to point out that shi lost that particular debate, particularly when shi seems to be trying to brush that fact away?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:36 pm
It's just challenging hir to fight. Rubbing people's faces in being wrong, even when they actually are, usually doesn't get you anywhere.Rochey wrote:How's it trolling to point out that shi lost that particular debate, particularly when shi seems to be trying to brush that fact away?