Page 16 of 29

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:26 pm
by stitch626
:laughroll:
You're right.

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:42 pm
by Kevsha
Tyyr wrote:I say this as nicely as I can. English, it's a wonderful language. What the hell did it ever do to you to deserve that kind of treatment?.
and i say this as nicely as i can:
Image
i apologize if my spelling/typing/grammar isn't up to your standards. i hunt and peck and try to tap these out quickly when i am at work. please if in the future you have something like this to say, do me a favor and keep it to yourself. i try and stick to saying constructive things and debate and i get this thrown at me.
Tyyr wrote: Yes they could, however a BB is going to chew smaller ships up and spit them out. If you're willing to watch many of your small ships get wasted every time you want to take down a large capital ship you can do it, it's just a really bad way to run a navy. That was the attitude with which the Sherman vs. Panther fights occurred in 1944-1945, yeah the Shermans won, but they were losing 5 to 6 Shermans for each Panther.
in the dom wars we saw the defiant rip bigger ships to shreds. this is a perfect example of a well designed smaller attack craft. we saw 1 of these ships kill the recency in the mirrror universe. working in a pack defiants would be unstoppable in a battle against a larger ship. what battle ships are we even talking about here in trek anyway? we never see the big bad dominion ones in battle so we have no idea what they would do. the only effective battle ship we ever see in battle is the scimitar and its overpowerd to the point of god hood and it can fire while cloaked.

all the ships we have seen in treck even the largest ones save for the ones i mentioned before and a borg cube focus most of thier secondary (heavy) weapons foward and have 360 degree primary (phaser, disruptor ect) coverage all the way around. so the battle ship would have to pick its targets and split the fire up. and again how many ships can it engauge before it reaches its power output limit. ok you may loose a ship but what happens when you go BB vs BB one comes out victorius but takes a beating i'm sure and is not nearly as combat effective i'm sure. the BB is certainly not the end all and be all in trek.

again i don't remember saying that battleships are a bad idea and there shouldn't be any and i certainly don't recall making any personal attacks at you Trry so i don't know where you get off. but a group of smaller ships like defiants could easily pummel a BB type ship into submission especially in a large fleet action when its destracted by larger targets

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:49 pm
by stitch626
English, it's a wonderful language.
No it isn't. Its an abomination. :mrgreen:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:13 pm
by Tyyr
Kevsha wrote:i apologize if my spelling/typing/grammar isn't up to your standards. i hunt and peck and try to tap these out quickly when i am at work. please if in the future you have something like this to say, do me a favor and keep it to yourself.
I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.
in the dom wars we saw the defiant rip bigger ships to shreds. this is a perfect example of a well designed smaller attack craft. we saw 1 of these ships kill the recency in the mirrror universe. working in a pack defiants would be unstoppable in a battle against a larger ship. what battle ships are we even talking about here in trek anyway?
If you'd follow the thread and what's already been stated, we're speaking of a roughly GCS/Sovereign sized vessel built in the style of the Defiant. The Defiant's only advantage, that it was an actual warship vs. the GCS flying hotel school of shipbuilding, is gone. It would be facing vessels built just like it, for war. In that scenario the tiny little Defiant gets chewed up and spit out by the Battleship because just like I outlined above, small ships in Trek have no real advantages over larger ships.
all the ships we have seen in treck even the largest ones save for the ones i mentioned before and a borg cube focus most of thier secondary (heavy) weapons foward and have 360 degree primary (phaser, disruptor ect) coverage all the way around.
Which conveniently ignores that many ships mount aft launcher as well. In fact the GCS had one fore and one aft. The Sovereign goes even higher than that. It also ignores that Federation photon torpedoes are not canon shells, they are guided weapons capable of maneuvering off the firing axis.
so the battle ship would have to pick its targets and split the fire up. and again how many ships can it enguge before it reaches its power output limit.
In a competently designed ship it will have enough power for all its weapons and its shields. Aside from that a battleship will have significantly higher firepower than any smaller ship. You're looking at 10 times or more the tonnage of a Defiant. It would easily be able to start picking off Defiant like ships quickly.
ok you may loose a ship but what happens when you go BB vs BB one comes out victorius but takes a beating i'm sure and is not nearly as combat effective i'm sure. the BB is certainly not the end all and be all in trek.
Well if in scenario one I start off with ten small ships, and end the battle with four left the best I can get those ships back up to is 40% strength of my previous force. Meanwhile my damaged, but still operating BB can be repaired and get back out there. You have to build six more small ships to get the small squadron back up to its previous strength.
i don't know where you get off.
Right about here.
but a group of smaller ships like defiants could easily pummel a BB type ship into submission especially in a large fleet action when its destracted by larger targets
Yeah, not really. For that to work you have to assume, 1) The BB captain is an idiot to completely ignore a real threat to the ship, 2) the smaller ships don't ever get shot at by the BB. Funny thing, if the BB is focusing on one large target he'll still have half or more of his phaser arrays unoccupied by that target and free for swatting down annoying small ships.

Throughout history people have tried to prove many smaller units can bring down larger more capable ones. Throughout history, precluding a technological revolution, the only time this has been made to work is when the people commanding the horde can absolutely drown the larger units in a sea of smaller units and absolutely not give a damn what happens to their people.

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:27 pm
by Kevsha
Tyyr wrote: I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.
well since you have set yourself down the course of the ass hole i'll stop before this degrades further. comments like that are the reson why don't always jump into interesting discussions on here. No one else here had a problem with my post (asside for arguing the thought was trying to convey). I made my arguement with out resorting to a better-than-thou attitde and personal attacks. stop off your high horse my friend and remember we are talking about a fictional TV show.

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:30 pm
by stitch626
I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.
Hmm, I understood everything he said. It's not like he's using txt spk. If you have problem with a lack of capitalization, become an English teacher.

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:16 pm
by Kevsha
stitch626 wrote: Hmm, I understood everything he said. It's not like he's using txt spk. If you have problem with a lack of capitalization, become an English teacher.

ROFLEZ i no rite! i wuz keik OMGZ WTF wen i saw it!!1! he rlly needz to chillax or sumthin LOL!

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:37 pm
by stitch626
:shock:
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:27 pm
by Kevsha
stitch626 wrote::shock:
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!
n00b

IMO BB r teh sux0rs caus they r all slow n stuff!!!! Teh lttle shipz r teh kewlest cause thay can fly all fast n stuff n teh BB cant hit them whan they do dat!!!!! OMG teh BB would be soooo pwned ROFLZ!!!!!!!LOLBBQ!!!!!!!111!!11!1!!!one!!!!!111!!eleven!!!!!

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:39 pm
by stitch626
Ok, lets stick to English now... or any other language for that matter. :lol:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:08 pm
by Reliant121
Woa...okay, I have seen bad text speak but thats wat OTT

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:20 pm
by SuperSaiyaMan12
So when is the Enterprise stats and everything going up onto ditl.org?

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:28 am
by Tyyr
Kevsha wrote:well since you have set yourself down the course of the ass hole i'll stop before this degrades further. comments like that are the reson why don't always jump into interesting discussions on here. No one else here had a problem with my post (asside for arguing the thought was trying to convey).
I'm sure one day I'll care what other people do or do not have a problem with. I'll probably be dead before then though. I highly suggest that you grow a thicker skin.
I made my arguement with out resorting to a better-than-thou attitde and personal attacks.
As did I. I simply commented on your mangling of the language first. My points are still waiting
stop off your high horse my friend and remember we are talking about a fictional TV show.
I do remember. You might want to get off your high horse as well or maybe we could start jousting. Alternately you could just ignore the comment and move on rather than obsessing about it.

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:04 am
by Deepcrush
Kevsha wrote:
stitch626 wrote::shock:
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!
n00b

IMO BB r teh sux0rs caus they r all slow n stuff!!!! Teh lttle shipz r teh kewlest cause thay can fly all fast n stuff n teh BB cant hit them whan they do dat!!!!! OMG teh BB would be soooo pwned ROFLZ!!!!!!!LOLBBQ!!!!!!!111!!11!1!!!one!!!!!111!!eleven!!!!!

Is it bad that I can understand this? :worried:

Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:41 am
by Teaos
Your a gamer, its to be expected.