Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
You're right.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
and i say this as nicely as i can:Tyyr wrote:I say this as nicely as I can. English, it's a wonderful language. What the hell did it ever do to you to deserve that kind of treatment?.
i apologize if my spelling/typing/grammar isn't up to your standards. i hunt and peck and try to tap these out quickly when i am at work. please if in the future you have something like this to say, do me a favor and keep it to yourself. i try and stick to saying constructive things and debate and i get this thrown at me.
in the dom wars we saw the defiant rip bigger ships to shreds. this is a perfect example of a well designed smaller attack craft. we saw 1 of these ships kill the recency in the mirrror universe. working in a pack defiants would be unstoppable in a battle against a larger ship. what battle ships are we even talking about here in trek anyway? we never see the big bad dominion ones in battle so we have no idea what they would do. the only effective battle ship we ever see in battle is the scimitar and its overpowerd to the point of god hood and it can fire while cloaked.Tyyr wrote: Yes they could, however a BB is going to chew smaller ships up and spit them out. If you're willing to watch many of your small ships get wasted every time you want to take down a large capital ship you can do it, it's just a really bad way to run a navy. That was the attitude with which the Sherman vs. Panther fights occurred in 1944-1945, yeah the Shermans won, but they were losing 5 to 6 Shermans for each Panther.
all the ships we have seen in treck even the largest ones save for the ones i mentioned before and a borg cube focus most of thier secondary (heavy) weapons foward and have 360 degree primary (phaser, disruptor ect) coverage all the way around. so the battle ship would have to pick its targets and split the fire up. and again how many ships can it engauge before it reaches its power output limit. ok you may loose a ship but what happens when you go BB vs BB one comes out victorius but takes a beating i'm sure and is not nearly as combat effective i'm sure. the BB is certainly not the end all and be all in trek.
again i don't remember saying that battleships are a bad idea and there shouldn't be any and i certainly don't recall making any personal attacks at you Trry so i don't know where you get off. but a group of smaller ships like defiants could easily pummel a BB type ship into submission especially in a large fleet action when its destracted by larger targets
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
No it isn't. Its an abomination.English, it's a wonderful language.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.Kevsha wrote:i apologize if my spelling/typing/grammar isn't up to your standards. i hunt and peck and try to tap these out quickly when i am at work. please if in the future you have something like this to say, do me a favor and keep it to yourself.
If you'd follow the thread and what's already been stated, we're speaking of a roughly GCS/Sovereign sized vessel built in the style of the Defiant. The Defiant's only advantage, that it was an actual warship vs. the GCS flying hotel school of shipbuilding, is gone. It would be facing vessels built just like it, for war. In that scenario the tiny little Defiant gets chewed up and spit out by the Battleship because just like I outlined above, small ships in Trek have no real advantages over larger ships.in the dom wars we saw the defiant rip bigger ships to shreds. this is a perfect example of a well designed smaller attack craft. we saw 1 of these ships kill the recency in the mirrror universe. working in a pack defiants would be unstoppable in a battle against a larger ship. what battle ships are we even talking about here in trek anyway?
Which conveniently ignores that many ships mount aft launcher as well. In fact the GCS had one fore and one aft. The Sovereign goes even higher than that. It also ignores that Federation photon torpedoes are not canon shells, they are guided weapons capable of maneuvering off the firing axis.all the ships we have seen in treck even the largest ones save for the ones i mentioned before and a borg cube focus most of thier secondary (heavy) weapons foward and have 360 degree primary (phaser, disruptor ect) coverage all the way around.
In a competently designed ship it will have enough power for all its weapons and its shields. Aside from that a battleship will have significantly higher firepower than any smaller ship. You're looking at 10 times or more the tonnage of a Defiant. It would easily be able to start picking off Defiant like ships quickly.so the battle ship would have to pick its targets and split the fire up. and again how many ships can it enguge before it reaches its power output limit.
Well if in scenario one I start off with ten small ships, and end the battle with four left the best I can get those ships back up to is 40% strength of my previous force. Meanwhile my damaged, but still operating BB can be repaired and get back out there. You have to build six more small ships to get the small squadron back up to its previous strength.ok you may loose a ship but what happens when you go BB vs BB one comes out victorius but takes a beating i'm sure and is not nearly as combat effective i'm sure. the BB is certainly not the end all and be all in trek.
Right about here.i don't know where you get off.
Yeah, not really. For that to work you have to assume, 1) The BB captain is an idiot to completely ignore a real threat to the ship, 2) the smaller ships don't ever get shot at by the BB. Funny thing, if the BB is focusing on one large target he'll still have half or more of his phaser arrays unoccupied by that target and free for swatting down annoying small ships.but a group of smaller ships like defiants could easily pummel a BB type ship into submission especially in a large fleet action when its destracted by larger targets
Throughout history people have tried to prove many smaller units can bring down larger more capable ones. Throughout history, precluding a technological revolution, the only time this has been made to work is when the people commanding the horde can absolutely drown the larger units in a sea of smaller units and absolutely not give a damn what happens to their people.
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
well since you have set yourself down the course of the ass hole i'll stop before this degrades further. comments like that are the reson why don't always jump into interesting discussions on here. No one else here had a problem with my post (asside for arguing the thought was trying to convey). I made my arguement with out resorting to a better-than-thou attitde and personal attacks. stop off your high horse my friend and remember we are talking about a fictional TV show.Tyyr wrote: I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Hmm, I understood everything he said. It's not like he's using txt spk. If you have problem with a lack of capitalization, become an English teacher.I won't. Frankly on a forum such as this the written word is all we have to communicate with so a little bit of care in its use is warranted.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
stitch626 wrote: Hmm, I understood everything he said. It's not like he's using txt spk. If you have problem with a lack of capitalization, become an English teacher.
ROFLEZ i no rite! i wuz keik OMGZ WTF wen i saw it!!1! he rlly needz to chillax or sumthin LOL!
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
n00bstitch626 wrote:
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!
IMO BB r teh sux0rs caus they r all slow n stuff!!!! Teh lttle shipz r teh kewlest cause thay can fly all fast n stuff n teh BB cant hit them whan they do dat!!!!! OMG teh BB would be soooo pwned ROFLZ!!!!!!!LOLBBQ!!!!!!!111!!11!1!!!one!!!!!111!!eleven!!!!!
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Ok, lets stick to English now... or any other language for that matter.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Woa...okay, I have seen bad text speak but thats wat OTT
- SuperSaiyaMan12
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
- Location: Auburn
- Contact:
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
So when is the Enterprise stats and everything going up onto ditl.org?
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
I'm sure one day I'll care what other people do or do not have a problem with. I'll probably be dead before then though. I highly suggest that you grow a thicker skin.Kevsha wrote:well since you have set yourself down the course of the ass hole i'll stop before this degrades further. comments like that are the reson why don't always jump into interesting discussions on here. No one else here had a problem with my post (asside for arguing the thought was trying to convey).
As did I. I simply commented on your mangling of the language first. My points are still waitingI made my arguement with out resorting to a better-than-thou attitde and personal attacks.
I do remember. You might want to get off your high horse as well or maybe we could start jousting. Alternately you could just ignore the comment and move on rather than obsessing about it.stop off your high horse my friend and remember we are talking about a fictional TV show.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Kevsha wrote:n00bstitch626 wrote:
Dear monkey man, I can't read txt language!
IMO BB r teh sux0rs caus they r all slow n stuff!!!! Teh lttle shipz r teh kewlest cause thay can fly all fast n stuff n teh BB cant hit them whan they do dat!!!!! OMG teh BB would be soooo pwned ROFLZ!!!!!!!LOLBBQ!!!!!!!111!!11!1!!!one!!!!!111!!eleven!!!!!
Is it bad that I can understand this?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Stats/Information on the new Enterprise
Your a gamer, its to be expected.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.