Starfleet size
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet size
Well, that's because after the Butlerian Jihad...
Wait, never mind.
Wait, never mind.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Starfleet size
"Technology is bad!"
"Umm, you mean like the ship you're flying on?"
"Oh, well, no that's ok because we need it. Everything else is bad!"
"So we shouldn't make anymore loud speakers for you then huh?"
"Umm, you mean like the ship you're flying on?"
"Oh, well, no that's ok because we need it. Everything else is bad!"
"So we shouldn't make anymore loud speakers for you then huh?"
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Starfleet size
pussification...Rochey wrote:Indeed. Despite the apparent pussification of Starfleet in the TNG+ era, the people seem to remember that first and formost they are soldiers, and that there sometimes is a need for them to die for the greater good.
Probably the best description of Starfleet in the TNG-era, I've ever read!
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Starfleet size
Hey, I just say what I see.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Starfleet size
Do you have something against pussys?Talos wrote: pussification...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet size
I'm all for them, myself.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Do you have something against pussys?Talos wrote: pussification...
I don't much care for cats, though.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Starfleet size
Does that include Chakats?Mikey wrote: I don't much care for cats, though.
Re: Starfleet size
Noooo I loooooove'emChakatBlackstar wrote:Do you have something against pussys?Talos wrote: pussification...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet size
Nope. First - if you have a different number of limbs, you're not the same thing at all. Second - once we're talking about sapient species, I give everything the same chance to be disliked on their own individual merits that I give to my fellow humans.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Does that include Chakats?Mikey wrote: I don't much care for cats, though.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re:
Maybe, but question is, how much of Federation's technology advantage comes from them not focusing on war technology?Thorin wrote:In an arms race the Klingons would just implode after crossing breaking point. It's clear that virtually all their economy is in their military and it's always as good as it can be - if they tried anymore they'd pull a Russia and just go over the top and roll down the hill.
The Romulans we know less about, but the fact that they only have one type of ship means their entire force would be stupidly easy to counter. Considering Starfleet designs clearly aren't as powerful as they could be, an arms race would put the Federation quite literally lightyears ahead of any Alpha quadrant race. If, from the start, they were always a military organisation, they'd be rivalling the Dominion - the fact that ships such as the Defiant can rival Dominion Battlecruisers means that if the Feds took a proper military approach, and scaled them up accordingly to something like an Excelsior - which clearly they could do if they simply recycled all the Excelsiors, they might get 5 Defiants out of it - then they'd be a match for any power in the Galaxy except maybe the Borg in my opinion.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet size
Not much if any - the use of the term "advantage" in this context clearly indicates a comparison of military effectiveness.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Starfleet size
Holy epic necro batman!
Honestly though, the UFP's advantage of tech and the number of dedicated warships it has doesn't matter. Neither really effect the other.
Honestly though, the UFP's advantage of tech and the number of dedicated warships it has doesn't matter. Neither really effect the other.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu