Info on the USS Kelvin

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by SomosFuga »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
SomosFuga wrote:
That is a technological issue.
Someone claimed that lasers aren't a practical weapon right now, I'm saying they are provided you are willing to live with the trade offs.
Ok, lasers are possible now and the military could make them operative in relatively short term, agreed.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Mark »

Rochey wrote:
Captain Picard's Hair wrote:Out of curiosity, when WAS the first time we heard of a probe being launched? Did we ever see one in TOS?
I'm fairly sure we heard of one in TOS. Damned if I can be sure, though.
Wasn't one used on the giant space amoeba in the Immunity Syndrome?

Of course, the Kelvin may have had different kind of probes. The movie seems to rate torps as weaker than phasers anyway, so maybe they didn't feel Kelvin needed them as "backup" weapons.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Mark wrote: Wasn't one used on the giant space amoeba in the Immunity Syndrome?
That may have been it.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
steamrunner
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:58 am
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by steamrunner »

Reliant121 wrote:The problem is the relative progression of technology has jumped so quickly in the past 30-40 years, that it is leaps and bounds ahead of the past millenia. It took us nearly 400 years to go from constructing ships from wood to constructing them from metal. In the past 100 years we have gone through iron, aluminium, steel, fibreglass, plastic even for small ones. Technologically speaking it took us 300/400 years to develop from crossbows to flintlock fired weapons. It took is 100 years from the first practical automatic machine guns to weapons which can fire 3500 bullets per minute, shred an aircraft in seconds and track missiles going at several times the speed of sound. Technology advances so fast today that a phone is virtually obsolete via technology standards merely weeks after it is released, Computers are made redundant compared to their successor in a month. If that trend continues, where technology develops at a phenominal rate, we could have plasma based weaponry, or anti-matter based weaponry far sooner than you would expect.
In eight short years, the U.S. went from a manned suborbital flight to landing men on the moon. At that rate of progress, one would expect to find a continuous manned presence on the moon. Yet, man has not set foot on the moon since 1972 - and, according to the latest projections - the earliest man will again set foot on the moon will be the year 2020...almost 50 years later! Sometimes a change in philosophy (and funding!) can wipe out a trend...I don't mean to be a downer, here, just some food for thought...
"If? If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle..."
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by SomosFuga »

IIRC the Kelvin had 2 diferent types of energy weapons: a continuous beam like a phaser but red and one of green or blue pulses similar to B5 interceptors. Were both fired by the same turret?
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Tsukiyumi »

SomosFuga wrote:...Were both fired by the same turret?
The blue pulses were from smaller turrets further forward on the saucer, from what I saw.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Lt. Staplic »

Tsukiyumi wrote:
SomosFuga wrote:...Were both fired by the same turret?
The blue pulses were from smaller turrets further forward on the saucer, from what I saw.
ya, that's what it looked like to me too.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Mark »

Ditto, but double check with GK and IK. Nobody saw it more than they did.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Check the pics on the ship entry. The two turret types are noticeably different, and in different spots on the hull.

The "white pulse" units look smaller, and are in an arc just inside the "ring" on the saucer dorsal surface. Two emitters are located in one turret housing.

The "red beam" phasers are located closer to the center of the saucer, are larger I think, and each bank comprises to separate turrets standing beside one another.

Very different weapons.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by SomosFuga »

I see it now, thanks.
I like the point defense phasers, it's a very good and realistic concept i think we never saw befor in Trek; i wonder how powerful are those and if you could use them for offensive or are too weak to use them against a shielded ship.
GrahamKennedy wrote:Check the pics on the ship entry. The two turret types are noticeably different, and in different spots on the hull.
In the armament section of the entry, what CIWS stands for?
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Tsukiyumi »

SomosFuga wrote:CIWS
Close In Weapon System
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Basicaly a point-defence weapon system. On the Kelvin it was probably used to down shuttles and torps.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Mark »

or Fighters or possibly small asteroids even. i'm guessing they lose effectivenes against shields
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Teaos »

Fighters generally = shuttles in trek
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

1

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Range debate split to here.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Post Reply