www.ditl.org

ChakatBlackstar wrote:And second of all I had a long term plan of what I was going to do. And then you show up out of the blue and make anything I try to do that much harder.

Forgive me for not being sympathetic.

Regarding the *his* thing - I genuinely and sincerely wasn't referring to your gender (even though you are to the best of my knowledge, a male). I emphasised that point only to ironically emphasise how the chief tactical officer was never your role. Thus saying it was your role was being sarcastic.

Blackstar, you've got a problem with me, and simply, that's your problem. I've no problem with you so you're going to have to deal with it. Do or don't join tactical - but you're not taking over my established role.

Thorin wrote:Blackstar, you've got a problem with me, and simply, that's your problem. I've no problem with you so you're going to have to deal with it. Do or don't join tactical - but you're not taking over my established role.

My problem isn't with you. It's with the fact you're hogging two positions to yourself, which is very rude.

Exactly what was your plan? Were you always planning on taking over Tac? Even if no player had control of Tac, we'd still have had an NPC officer in charge, who would still have had the role

No, it was on taking over the fighters. And an NPC wouldn't complain about me taking his or her position.

No, it was on taking over the fighters.

Which you probably wouldn't have been let do in the first place, even if Thorin had stayed gone.

And an NPC wouldn't complain about me taking his or her position.

Yes, he would. So would the rest of the officer characters. M'Real isn't qualified to run Tactical, and I doubt many people would trust someone whose flight record consisted of crashing expensive craft into planets and who hasn't had any real flight experience for three years to be head pilot.

ChakatBlackstar wrote:My problem isn't with you. It's with the fact you're hogging two positions to yourself, which is very rude.

What? Clearly your problem is completely with me. You are refusing to join tactical because you'd have to report to a 'snotty nosed brat'. Not the fact I am 'hogging' two positions.

No, it was on taking over the fighters. And an NPC wouldn't complain about me taking his or her position.

Taking over the fighters requires you to join tactical, and report to this 'snotty nosed brat'. You're going to be going backwards if you backpedal any more.

ChakatBlackstar wrote:

Out of story you've got a problem with being answerable to me if you did join tactical

Gee, did you figure that out all by yourself did you?

No, I'm unwilling to have stuff dictated to me by a snot nosed brat

Yeah - no problem with me. At all.

Before you were completely ignoring my points about having secondary characters in that role which has always been unoccupied. Now, supposedly, it's your main gripe! Yeah, right.

Thorin, I'm sick of fighting with you and dealing with your bad attitude. I'm sick of Rochey always joining the stronger side of the arguement. And I'm sick of not being able to do anything fun in this RP.

ChakatBlackstar wrote:Thorin, I'm sick of fighting with you and dealing with your bad attitude. I'm sick of Rochey always joining the stronger side of the arguement. And I'm sick of not being able to do anything fun in this RP.

My fault. Yeah. My fault because you've got a problem with me, then say you have no problem with me, then when I point out you actually said you had a problem with me, you're "sick of fighting".

And Rochey joining the stronger side of the argument? You actually concede that your argument is very weak? So, you have said that the argument against your proposals is stronger than the argument for them, and yet you still think you're right?

Thorin, I'm sick of fighting with you and dealing with your bad attitude.

Blackstar, the only one with the attitude here is you. These characters have been long-established. We aren't simply going to throw them out because you're too stuborn to either create a new character or serve under someone else.

I'm sick of Rochey always joining the stronger side of the arguement.

And I'm sick of you always making idiotic suggestions and then whining when you don't get your own way.
And I'd love to see your reasoning that I always join the 'stronger' side of a debate, considering that in many cases I'm the first one to point out the problems with them.

And I'm sick of not being able to do anything fun in this RP.

No one's stopping you having fun, we're only stopping you taking over positions already taken by other members.

Rochey wrote:

Thorin, I'm sick of fighting with you and dealing with your bad attitude.

Blackstar, the only one with the attitude here is you. These characters have been long-established. We aren't simply going to throw them out because you're too stuborn to either create a new character or serve under someone else.

My character is a Lt. Cmd. while his is a LT. I do not understand why a Lt. Cmd. would take orders from someone of a lower rank

And I'm sick of you always making idiotic suggestions and then whining when you don't get your own way.
And I'd love to see your reasoning that I always join the 'stronger' side of a debate, considering that in many cases I'm the first one to point out the problems with them.

I'm trying to be creative. All your character has ever done is punish crewman and create problems for everyone.

And you don't have to join Thorin's side on this. And I'm not the only one who's noticed that you always join the winning side.

And I'm sick of not being able to do anything fun in this RP.

No one's stopping you having fun, we're only stopping you taking over positions already taken by other members.

No, everytime I do something you or your character block my path. Example: I couldn't send a message without you going through my mail. Then I had to deal with getting unmonitored messeges out. That was NOT FUN.

Now if I continue with this RP I have to come up with a reason to keep my character on board and deal with Monroe accusing my character of something she didn't do. Gee that sounds like a lot of fun. NOT!

ChakatBlackstar wrote:My character is a Lt. Cmd. while his is a LT. I do not understand why a Lt. Cmd. would take orders from someone of a lower rank

You purposefully created your character as a Lt. Cmdr in an attempt to get round that. So I guess your plan backfired. I'm tactical and in the chain of command. You are not.

I'm trying to be creative. All your character has ever done is punish crewman and create problems for everyone.

And you don't have to join Thorin's side on this. And I'm not the only one who's noticed that you always join the winning side.

Again - you know you're on the losing side. You argument has no basis. Why do you still maintain you're right - when you have said yourself that your argument is weak?

No, everytime I do something you or your character block my path. Example: I couldn't send a message without you going through my mail. Then I had to deal with getting unmonitored messeges out. That was NOT FUN.

Now if I continue with this RP I have to come up with a reason to keep my character on board and deal with Monroe accusing my character of something she didn't do. Gee that sounds like a lot of fun. NOT!

Because you are creating suspicious and shady characters with backstories that involve intelligence and investigations - you expect people not to accuse you of things? Well, I'll be damned! You created the backstory, don't moan when things backfire. Though things are backfiring quite a lot for you.

Again - you know you're on the losing side. You argument has no basis. Why do you still maintain you're right - when you have said yourself that your argument is weak?

Just because you have a stronger arguement doesn't mean that you're right. It just means you're more likely to win. There's a difference. Didn't you learn anything from high school law classes?

Because you are creating suspicious and shady characters with backstories that involve intelligence and investigations - you expect people not to accuse you of things?

She's not shady. She'd be very upfront about her background if she was asked about it.

Though things are backfiring quite a lot for you.

Gee, you've noticed? Thank you mister obvious

ChakatBlackstar wrote:Just because you have a stronger arguement doesn't mean that you're right.

Um...

Yeah, sure.

Your argument boils down to you having a problem with me. You have presented no viable argument and no good ideas in this situation. You are categorically wrong. Military assets - the fighters, are tactical's domain. I am in every way more qualified to run tactical than you.

She's not shady. She'd be very upfront about her background if she was asked about it.

She comes from Starfleet Intelligence and has come aboard to investigate deaths, aswell as knowing that Caitan dude. Sorry - your backstory.

You have a problem with me, nothing else. Move on.

Thorin wrote:You have a problem with me, nothing else. Move on.

I'd like to point out that you're the one who creates problems for the forum. I am trying to create an interesting story here.

I hope a console explodes in your character's face

ChakatBlackstar wrote:I'd like to point out that you're the one who creates problems for the forum. I am trying to create an interesting story here.

Interesting? Yes. But then again world economics is interesting. Doesn't make it good.

I hope a console explodes in your character's face

I genuinely think you'd actually wish death on me as a person

Thorin wrote:

ChakatBlackstar wrote:I'd like to point out that you're the one who creates problems for the forum. I am trying to create an interesting story here.

Interesting? Yes. But then again world economics is interesting. Doesn't make it good.

You're playing it fast and loose with the word interesting aren't you.

I hope a console explodes in your character's face

I genuinely think you'd actually wish death on me as a person

No....I'm not that mean. I hope your life sucks, but die...nah